“Wall-E”
2008
**** out of ****
Director: Andrew Stanton
Cast: Fred Willard, Jeff Garlin, Ben Burtt


Andrew Stanton’s last Pixar film, “Finding Nemo,” attracted everyone… but me. I hate that movie with a burning passion. It burns like the flames of hell and smells like the smell of Jennifer Aniston queefing up Vince Vaughn’s face (oh, and this will be the only place where you will read the word queef in a review for a child’s film). I hated that film back when it was released, and I hate it still now. The only difference between then and now is five years time and hairs on my ass.

But within these five years, Andrew Stanton pulled himself together; to not only create one of the best films of this year, but one of the best films of all-time. It kicks the shit out of “Ratatouille,” and that movie is a damn classic. I have to admit – even though I was greatly excited about “Wall-E,” I was ready for a failure. Of a three-part movie day, I decided to push “Wall-E” back to the last film. I realized after “Wall-E” ended that if I was to have seen that movie first, I probably wouldn’t have gone seen any of the other films that I saw today. I would have watched “Wall-E” two more times.

The story of “Wall-E” is a simple one at first glance, but in between it all, “Wall-E” is just as complicated as the process was to make it. The year is somewhere in the 2700s and every human has left Planet Earth and went onto a vacation on a spaceship called Axiom, thus decreasing productivity of every last bit of every single source that we had left. Actually, it really isn’t a vacation. Everyone is working for Buy N Large, which is similar to Wal-Mart.

The water soon begins to evaporate into the Earth until there is no more left, so that means all of the plants are dead. The only thing left on the Earth, aside from empty buildings, is a bunch of trash. While there were still humans left on the Earth, robots cleaned up the trash, until they all became defunct. Except for one… and that last robot on Earth is the main character of our story.

Wall-E, (Ben Burtt) short for Waste Allocation Load Lifter Earth-Class, wakes up everyday and repeats the same exact thing – he cleans up trash, finds bits and pieces that he finds interesting, and brings them back to his little shack, where “Hello Dolly!” is played 24/7 and tons of toys lie around. Unlike the other Wall-Es that came before him, the Wall-E we get to know has a personality, and by watching nothing but “Hello Dolly!,” all that he really looks for is love.

That comes one day when he is doing his usual duty and a spaceship drops another robot onto the ground. This robot that Wall-E meets is named Eve, and she came here in search for some type of life on Earth. When Wall-E shows her a plant he finds to try and impress her, Eve boards the spaceship again with the plant, after she finds what she was there to get. But Wall-E is tempted to make her his queen, and when he believes that she is in danger, he must go save Eve. He does so by holding onto the spaceship until it lands back on the Axiom.

Only if Wall-E knew that this discovery of a plant can bring an entire colony together…

The first forty minutes works because Andrew Stanton makes them work. Have no fear when I say that the first forty minutes is an easy comparison to the first half of last December’s “I Am Legend.” Instead of vampires and zombies replace them with trash and dust-storms. Our hero fears dust-storms because he doesn’t know what to do with them. He becomes so scared that he’ll lock himself in his little space and won’t come out until the next day. He’ll wake up and he will do the same thing every day, and he doesn’t realize that he could stop whenever he wants to, but something keeps Wall-E going. We’re never quite sure if it is the toys that he finds or the love that he longs for, but we can only assume that it’s both.

Whenever I read a review for “Wall-E,” I look at what the readers think. Most of the reviewers who reviewed “Wall-E” before it was released tend to overanalyze it. Yes, “Wall-E” is the type of film where you actually have to know what is going on in order to get it, but if you are going into the theater and just wants to see some robot loving, that’s all fine too. I will admit that the character of “Wall-E” is one of the most fascinating characters that Pixar has ever dreamt up. In one scene of the movie, I picked apart of all of Wall-E’s actual emotions, and I found at least fifteen emotions in the first sixty seconds of thinking.

But what requires more heavily thinking is how the Earth has changed since the last time humans have been on it. Two weeks ago, M. Night Shyamalan examined what would have happened if bees disappeared from the Earth. Andrew Stanton examines what happens if we all just up and left. Stanton creates a horrific atmosphere while creating “Wall-E.” You don’t want to see what will happen one day if we all up and leave from here. I very rarely feel bad for anybody, but Christ, you just have to feel bad for the next generation. They have to pay for our mistakes because we don’t care about the Earth anymore. We keep acting with this attitude and the world will be gone in another thirty years, and we will have no one to blame but ourselves.

It isn’t only on the Earth where you must analyze, but you must analyze the setting in space. When one generation came aboard the Axiom, they arrived as skinny and boney as every. Now that the characters live in a place ruled by a Buy N Large on every corner, they replace walking with chairs that move around themselves, replace healthy foods with fat and unhealthy shakes that pack just as much calories as a meal does, and don’t work any longer. Instead of working, getting exercise, and eating healthy, we now have become a fat and obese society where we no longer have to worry about having a bad day.

Hey, it’s what you all wish for right?

Some wouldn’t believe me when I say that the romantic subplot is just another way to continue the story. It almost acts like a MacGuffin, but it doesn’t use any of the strengths that a MacGuffin does. Rather than drive the story, the romantic subplot is just another way to drop our characters off at situations where they can try and be the usual Pixar hero. And though it might sound like a bad thing, you must know that the romantic scenes work better than any of the other scenes in the film. By the time the movie is over, you don’t want to leave. You want to spend more time with the two lovers. “Wall-E” isn’t only the best science-fiction film since “E.T.,” but is the single best romantic film since “Casablanca.” The last time that we saw such a great romantic film was sixty-six years ago.

The scenes on the ship aren’t any less but breathtaking. I’m sure some people will say that it is the slow point of the film, but I beg to differ. I’m sure you probably had heard that there is very little dialogue as far as “Wall-E” goes, and within the first forty minutes, there are only a few lines of dialogue. But the second half is loaded with a bit more dialogue. It can easily be called Pixar’s silent movie, but if you want to call it that then you will have to call “2001: A Space Odyssey” Kubrick’s very own silent movie. This movie owes a lot to “2001.” Not only is the villain much like the villain from “2001,” but the movie wouldn’t be without the theme song from “2001.”

I can go on and on about “Wall-E,” but I think I’ve said enough. Without trying to spoil too much of the final act, I really want my readers to go into the movie hoping the best. Some will be on the fence, saying that there is too little dialogue and too much visual. You probably said the same exact thing about Charlie Chaplin movies. I won’t be afraid to admit it when I say that “Wall-E” is excellent, but the next step up from calling it my favorite movie of 2008 is by saying that it is my favorite film of all-time.

Oh fuck it, I’m buying myself a ticket to see it again tomorrow.

16 comments

  1. JD // June 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM  

    Excellent review. I feel like I have seen the best film of the year.
    I don't think I have ever loved a Pixar film as much as this one and I love a lot of them

  2. The Rub // June 28, 2008 at 3:31 PM  

    Awesome review! This movie is fucking brilliant, that's all there is too it.

  3. Kelsey Zukowski // June 28, 2008 at 4:45 PM  

    wow, both you and Jerry wrote incredible reviews for this film. The best since E.T. and Casablanca? I have to see it now!

  4. Randy // June 29, 2008 at 2:39 PM  

    Alright... I have to comment. Tony, you are getting carried away. Your favorite film of all time??? Are you kidding me??? It's an animated children's film! The most romantic movie since Casablanca??? What??? They're animated robots!!! Come on...

    I did not like this movie. It's targeted audience was children, and like you said, the plot was very complicated. There is no way in hell that my 5- yr. old cousin could have realized all the things you pointed out in your review. All of this "deeper meaning"... Ask a 5-yr. old what Wall-E was about they'll tell you a robot. Not a love story.. not the devestation of earth.

    God... I am really pissed by this movie... and by your review. Go to these animated films for fun. To relax. For some fiction. Not to analyze them... and claim that they're the best film of all-time. Come on...

  5. Randy // June 29, 2008 at 2:40 PM  

    There is no way in hell this is the best movie of all time... and I cannot see how this is your favorite.

    Tony, I have lost all respect for you.

  6. TonyD // June 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM  

    There is a difference between a children’s film and a family film. A children film would be that “Veggietales” movie that came out this year, because only children and people who wear helmets can watch that movie. A family flick would be “Speed Racer,” “Kung Fu Panda,” and, yes, “Wall-E.”

    It is the most romantic film since “Casablanca” because we can actually fall in love with these characters. Every romantic comedy that came out this year had at least one despicable character – “27 Dresses” had that Akerman girl, “Over Her Dead Body” had Eva Longoria, and “Fool’s Gold” had the entire cast. Where in “Wall-E” is there a despicable character? The title character is so easily recognizable with the audience because he just wants the same thing that everyone else wants. The characters in those movies? They only want greed and hell. It doesn’t sound the least bit romantic to me.

    The target audience was NOT for children. It was for families WITH children. Andrew Stanton once said that he never gave a shit what the audience thought while putting his thoughts into this, “Toy Story,” and “Finding Nemo.” “Ratatouille” had enough for everyone to like about it. Kids will love Remy the Rat and Linguini and adults will love Anton Ego. With “Wall-E,” most young kids want to see Wall-E and Eve save the day. Older adults want to see that, and they want to see some great sci-fi references. I dare you to go back again and point out all of the obvious references to “2001: A Space Odyssey,” “Star Wars,” “E.T.,” and the other Pixar flicks.

    Oh, and if your 5 year old cousin can realize everything that I mentioned in my review, the kid must be smarter than you.

    And yes, “Wall-E” is a love story. It has so many layers to it that saving the world is just a subplot when it comes to Wall-E and Eve spending time together. This world has gone to shit. We rely on the internet and technology so much nowadays that “Wall-E” spends time to display the negatives of it. Why get exercise when you can sit down on a chair that floats and takes you to places?

    And if you honestly think that “Wall-E” isn’t one of the best films of all-time, you must have no taste in film. I never do say this unless if a time like that has to come around, but how in the hell can you like “Horton Hears A Who?” and “The Bucket List” but not “Wall-E?”

  7. Randy // June 29, 2008 at 3:18 PM  

    Despite this being a "family film".. It is still targeted at young audiences. Older people only see these movies because they take their kids. Older people don't see these films on their own for their own pleasure... they would much rather prefer "Get Smart" in a heartbeat. Let's face it... Pixar is known for their animated children's films. The only time adults go to these films is when they're with children. Except for, of course... you.

    Now you mention that you can fall in love with these characters. Are you kidding me? They're robots... They are FAKE emotions... animated. The purpose of this film was not a love story. Children at that age do not understand love. This is not "Casablanca"... This is "Toy Story".

    The purpose of this film was to give kids a chance to come out and see a neat animated robot. A film that even kids can understand. And yet... Pixar failed in even doing that much. I'm sorry to say... but the plot of this film is FAR too much advanced for its targeted audience.

    What you say about how all we, as Americans, do is sit on the Internet... and watch TV and use up Earth's resources... as trash builds up and the Earth is pretty much going to shit...

    Yes. I got that. YOU got that. However... we're adults!!! Wake up! Of course we realize what is going on... but like i said before, my five-year old cousin DOESN'T UNDERSTAND. HE JUST THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT A ROBOT!!!

    Tell a child this was a love story they will look at you like you're nuts. Ask them why everyone was forced onto a ship and why they're all obese and they will look at you like you're nuts.

    You mention that I liked "The Bucket List" and "Horton Hears A Who"... Horton only got 2 stars... which.. isn't great. The Bucket List got 3 from me, because yes, I liked it. But, that isn't an animated film. If anything, that film was aimed at an older audience.

    I did not review Wall-E. So you cannot compare my thoughts on it to previous films I have reviewed. However, if I were to review Wall-E.. I would give it 2 stars (out of a possible 4). Because... I as an adult... liked the movie. JUST THE MOVIE ITSELF. However, the thing that is getting me, and why it is only getting 2 stars... is because it is way too complicated for little kids. They just don'y understand what happened. At least in horton hears a who they know who horton is, and what he is doing.

    I honestly cannot believe that you like an animated, children's (family, whatever) film as your best film of 08. And more so... of ALL TIME?

    I'm sorry. But everyone has their own opinion. And don't judge my taste in film. People like diffent things. I have taste in film... it just may not be the same as yours.

    And no. This IS NOT my favorite movie of the year. And this IS NOT my favorite of all time. And i DO NOT think that this is one of the best romantic love stories of all time. In my opinion to think any of these things is absurd.

  8. TonyD // June 29, 2008 at 3:52 PM  

    Yes, but you don’t seem to get this – it is NOT intended for young audiences. It’s intended for FAMILIES. Older people take their kids to go see this movie not only for the kids, but for themselves also. Out of all the summer blockbusters, only three really delivered this year – “Iron Man,” “Kung Fu Panda,” and “Wall-E.” Older people go see films like “Get Smart” because they grew up with the television show, but didn’t they grow up with children films too? There was a thing called children’s films back in the 1950s too, you know.

    Pixar isn’t known for their animated children’s films. Before they even made full features, they made only short films. Go back to their new DVD and watch the short film collection (yes, Randy, you can rent it at WOW). These were all made before they started to make full features, and their short films were intended for no one but people who were able to appreciate art. Even back then, kids didn’t understand half of the stuff that went on. They watched those short films to look at the funny faces that some of these characters did… which they still do now. Their new short film “Presto” is a perfect example of that.

    The only time adults go to these films are only when they lug their children, huh? What explains you, me, and the 141 critics that went to go see it before it was released?

    You can’t fall in love with robots, but yet, you can fall in love with an iron suit, a rat, or even a talking toy?! Isn’t the point of “Wall-E” to meet two robots that have personalities like a regular human being? And if kids don’t understand love yet, why are mommy and daddy still together?

    It’s hypocritical of you to say how the film is far too advanced, but if kids can say that the film is about a robot after watching it, do you think it’s too advanced THEN? Pixar has always been the thinking man’s animation studio. “Ratatouille” examined rats in the kitchen and the art of criticism, but do you think kids understood that? And “A Bug’s Life” was about the diet cycle, but do you think kids understood that? You say that the problem with “Wall-E” is not that it is complex, but it has all sorts of messages too. Why should “Wall-E” not have a message about friendship, but “Monsters, Inc.” and “Finding Nemo” can?

    And if we supposedly realized the problems with technology, don’t you think that we would do something about it instead of keep using it the way it is? Your five year old cousin doesn’t understand it because no one will explain it to him. Your cousin won’t understand a film like “An Inconvenient Truth,” so Pixar explains it in the nicest way possible, the same way “Arctic Tale,” “March of the Penguins,” and “Horton Hears A Who” has done – the earth is fucked, but if we pull together, we can do something about it.

    Tell a children that it is a love story and they will look at you like you’re nuts? Dude, don’t you understand that it IS A LOVE STORY? Wall-E and Eve LOVE EACH OTHER. Kids understand that, you understand that, and I understand that. That is the main point of the film and that is the best part of the film. If you honestly think that the film isn’t about Wall-E and Eve’s relationship, did you watch the same movie I did? You sat right next to me!

    You don’t have to review “Wall-E” if you are breaking down your thoughts here. If you look at “Horton Hears A Who” in an older person’s perspective, can’t you look at “Wall-E” in an older person’s perspective? You say that you liked “Wall-E,” but you give it two stars out of four because you think that it is too complicated for kids. You can say that if you are a kid, but if you are an adult, you can’t give it two stars and say that it is too complicated for a kid. Do you think that all of the great critics like “Wall-E” but give it a bad review because kids can’t understand it?

    You came over my house last month and we watched “The Mist.” It supported no hope FOR our planet and you loved it. But you watch “Wall-E” and don’t like it because it supported just a little bit of hope left?

    Your argument is that Pixar’s films are only about the children. So you expect that adults to go to the films to gut their eyeballs out by watching it? No, Pixar wants to give something to both audiences. They always have, and they always will do so. As long as adults keep seeing these movies, there will be things for them and children. Like it or not, you’re wrong. I might have criticized your taste and you told me not to judge yours, but what are you doing to everyone else’s taste?

  9. Randy // June 29, 2008 at 4:10 PM  

    Alright. Now you are putting words in my mouth. I never said I hated Wall-E because there is hope for the planet in there. Hell, I didn't even say I hated Wall-E! Let alone for you to imply that I don't like the planet.

    In a nutshell, all I am trying to say is that they could have done a better job making the film more... "child-friendly". Kids want to go to these films so they can understand them on their own, without having to have adults to explain it. Hell, if my cousin wanted to see a film, only to have it explained to him, I would show him "An Inconvienient Truth" and explain it to him. FYI, but there are ways to send messages to children, in ways that they can understand. You mentioned a film by the title of "Monsters, Inc.". What did that teach? Kindness. Clearly. It taught kindness, by example. Sully and Mike, monsters, demonstrated kindness by looking after Boo, and trying to get her back to her home, despite what all the other monsters thought of humans.

    The point is this: I have cleary stated my opinion. You have stated yours. Everyone is entitled to their own thoughts and opinions. I would not say it is the best film of the year. I would not say that is is "fucking brilliant". It is most definately not my favortie of all time. Hell, it's not even my favorite animated film of all time. I think if it really wanted to teach the message of preserving Earth... it could have done it in a better way that children could understand.

    I am not denying that there was a subplot about love. Of course there fucking was!!! However, I think it is a little... fucked up to say that this animated... children's movie is the most romantic film since Casablanca... that the emotions of the robot touched you... come on... it's fake, completely animated.

    Neither one of us has any right to judge each other's taste in film... However, after reading your opinion of Wall-E, I must say I have lost a great deal of respect for you.

  10. TonyD // June 29, 2008 at 4:29 PM  

    What I said was not to put words in your mouth, but to continue my argument. You said that everyone knows about the world going to shit, but you never said about ways that we can fix it. “The Mist” was to show how we can survive the world going to shit, whereas “Wall-E” is how we can fix it. “Wall-E” said it best to join together and help fix the Earth so future generations can live again. “An Inconvenient Truth” said it so scientifically that no wonder that a kid wouldn’t understand it. And I never said you hated “Wall-E” and that you didn’t like the planet.

    The film is as child friendly as any Pixar film could possibly be, but there has to be ways to get the adults interested. By presenting a problem and offering a solution to the problem, it will make ways so that adults are more cautious. A kid can’t understand that we have to fix the Earth? I don’t think “Monsters, Inc.” is about kindness as much as it is about friendship, but to each of their own.

    How can you think that it is fucked up to say that “Wall-E” is the most romantic film since “Casablanca?” I said it before and I’ll say it again – all of the characters here are LIKEABLE. You haven’t even SEEN “Casablanca.” So yes, “Wall-E” is the most romantic film since “Casablanca,” and if not that, then “Gone With the Wind.” It doesn’t matter if it is computer animated or not. Love is love, and if a cynical man like I can say it, you can too.

    You can lose as much respect as you possibly can. I don’t give any rat’s ass if anyone does, but I hate it when someone can criticize how wrong my opinion is without backing up any facts. I got a few out of you, but truly, you know you like it, and each time you post a comment, it shows that you like it more and more.

  11. Randy // June 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM  

    I am not criticizing your opinion. Was I not the one who said that we shouldn't criticize each other's opinion? Read above. And if I'm not correct... I already said that I liked Wall-E!!! Read above. I said it.

    So your point is moot.

    Yes, a kid can understand that we have to fix the Earth. However, I don't think that children can understand that Wall-E was about the fact that we have to fix the Earth. They don't relate the two.

    I may have not seen Casablanca. However, it is famous for it being a romance film. I may have to go and rent it tonight now. However, my point is this:

    I FIND IT VERY HARD TO BELIEVE THAT YOU FIND A CARTOON ROMANTIC.

    I'm sorry. Yes, I did lose some respect for calling it your favorite of all time. If you had said favorite animated of all time, then this conversaion wouldn't exsist. However, I find it hard to believe that it is your favortie of all time.

    I did not criticize your opinion. I simply said I lost respect for you. Read above. And I did say I liked Wall-E. From an adults perspective. The only bad in it is that I think that they could have done a better job "teaching a lesson" to the youngsters.

    Regardless, great review. Even though I disagree with your opinion, you stated your opinion well, with many facts. Kudos for that.

    Thanks for the debate. It has been fun. I think we have both openly voiced our opinions. Let's sit back now, and let our readers comment on what they think, huh?

    P.S. When's the next movie run? Friday was fun. Now that I'm back in the States, I have a lot of free time on my hands. Just let me know. =)



    *To our readers: Tony and I are personal friends. We live relitively close to each other, and have known each other for a long time. Those of you that know us also know that we are famous for our debates. Our Chuck and Larry debate was the funniest we've ever done. So be prepared. There will be many many more of these to come.

  12. Randy // June 29, 2008 at 5:34 PM  

    WHOA! HOLD UP! FLAG ON THE PLAY. I made a slight error. I said I find it hard to believe that you find a cartoon romantic.

    My bad. I worded that wrong. "Lady and the Tramp" is a romantic cartoon, as is "Wall-E". HOWEVER, the point i was trying to make was that I find it hard to believe that you found "Wall-E" was romantic as "Casablanca".

    Sorry for the screw-up.

  13. TonyD // June 29, 2008 at 9:42 PM  

    Read your first two three comments. Yes, you did criticize my opinion and called it absurd. And yeah, I know you said that you liked “Wall-E,” but you can’t give it two stars and say that you liked it. You gave the same score to “Horton.” Care to elaborate?

    Oh, and it is my favorite animated film of all time too, if you wanted to know it that far.

    If “Wall-E” can’t teach a kid to do something about the earth, and if they are too young to understand everything that went on in “Inconvenient Truth,” what can a kid find out about the Earth and how to save it?

  14. TonyD // June 29, 2008 at 9:49 PM  

    Oh, and as far as Pixar's true intentions with their films, watch "The Pixar Story" on Starz.

  15. TonyD // June 29, 2008 at 9:52 PM  

    Oh, and one more thing - rent Casablanca, watch it, and then go see Wall-E with me once more before it leaves theaters. Then compare how romantic the films are. I can guarantee you that you will think the same thing

  16. Randy // June 30, 2008 at 8:26 AM  

    Lol ok. I can't believe Wall-E is number 9... lol. I think you may have got me on this one... However. Opinions are opinions. =)