DIRECTED BY
James Mangold
STARRING
Tom Cruise - Roy Miller
Cameron Diaz - June Havens
Peter Sarsgaard - Fitzgerald
Jordi Molla - Antonio
Viola Davis - Director George
Paul Dano - Simon Feck
Marc Blucas - Rodney
Maggie Grace - April Havens
Genre - Action/Comedy
Running Time - 110 Minutes
Score - 3 Howls Outta 4
Tom Cruise is seen as a lot of things. He's an acting veteran for the past 25+ years. He's an action star. He's a dramatic actor. He's become a comedic actor. He's a Scientologist. He's a complete nutjob. He's delusional about science and the world around him. But the most important part is that he's a huge star with a ton of box office appeal. That's right everyone, Tom Cruise knows how to bring the goods to the silver screen.
Well...that was until his KNIGHT AND DAY, 2010's supposed summer action blockbuster, failed at the box office and has become Cruise's lowest grossing action film to date. With the media backlash [even after his hilarious turn as Lou Grossman at 2010's MTV Movie Awards] and reviews from critics who pretty much bashed KNIGHT AND DAY, the film did a dismal box office take in its first weekend and has dropped dramatically ever since.
Which is a shame, because the film isn't all that bad and is made for the mindless summer blockbuster season. However, there are flaws to KNIGHT AND DAY that make it a possible watch instead of a must-see event.
PLOT
Roy Miller (Tom Cruise), is an FBI agent who may or may not have gone rogue, but is definitely in possession of a ultra-powered battery that everyone seems to want a hold of. He bumps into June Havens (Cameron Diaz) at the airport as she's about to catch a flight to Boston to attend her sister's (Maggie Grace) wedding. While June seems to be smitten with Roy, Roy is using June as a mule for the battery without her knowledge. On the flight, Roy is attacked by assassins and murders them all, taking June as a partner/hostage.
After some hilarity, Roy tells June that FBI agents (Peter Sarsgaard and Viola Davis) want this battery and that they'll tell her that he's insane and not to be trusted. Not sure who to trust at this point, June decides to go along with Roy's story, causing her to be caught up in Roy's life of espionage. Also, they fall in love...like you couldn't guess that.
REVIEW
KNIGHT AND DAY is mostly a fun, mindless action film that is a
more comedic and cartoon-ish version of the MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE franchise [also starring Cruise]. You're caught up in the excitement, the visuals are nice, and it's well paced. Unfortunately, there's something missing about KNIGHT AND DAY that makes it a standout.
Let's deal with the positives first. The acting is very solid in KNIGHT AND DAY. Say what you want about Tom Cruise's personal life, but no one can say he's a terrible actor. In fact, he's the best part of the film and carries it quite well. We all know Cruise can handle action and he does that fantastically here, doing most of his own stunts and having fun riding his motorcycle through Spain while bulls chase him and assassins want to shoot his brains out. But Cruise also brings on the funny here, really making Roy a certifiable lunatic in terms of his actions and behavior. This makes him engaging to watch, as he's always confidence, charismatic, and definitely excited to be on screen. I wish he had better material to play off of here, but Cruise makes it work and it's a joy to watch him do what he does best.
Cameron Diaz, who I usually find pretty annoying in most films to be honest, is actually more than okay here. She plays the confused and neurotic June to perfection and actually looks pretty cute doing it. While she does have her action moments, especially towards the end, she's mainly the girlfriend/eye candy role that we usually see in action films. But she handles it well and maintains incredible chemistry with Cruise [who already worked together in 2001's VANILLA SKY]. I wouldn't mind see them do another film together.
The other actors are also very good, but they're not given much to do. I will say that Peter Sarsgaard and Marc Blucas are the standouts in the supporting roles. Sarsgaard's role is very predictable but he does the most with it. And Blucas has a funny scene with both Cruise and Diaz that's one of the better moments in the film.
The direction by James Mangold is also very good, even though it's not his best work as a director. Comparing KNIGHT AND DAY to his work on GIRL, INTERRU
PTED, 3:10 TO YUMA remake, and especially WALK THE LINE, isn't really fair. But Mangold shoots the action scenes well [even though I noticed Cruise's stunt double very clearly in one shot that made me laugh] and he keeps the film light-hearted. Mangold seems more focused on the chemistry and relationship between Roy and June rather than all the exciting stuff that's around them, which doesn't hurt the film much at all. In fact, I'm glad Mangold focused more on the comedy than on the action, since it takes stale premise and adds something to it to make it a bit staler. Nice direction all around.
The action sequences are also fun, even if they are pretty much action film norms. From the running of the bulls scene, to the rooftop chase, to shootouts in a warehouse, and to dealing with explosions on an island, they're everything you'd want in a film like this. They're over-the-top and pretty implausible, but the film never takes itself all that seriously anyway, so I have no qualms.
What makes KNIGHT AND DAY suffer, however, is the poor script by Patrick O'Neill. While the film does manage to get to point A to point B to point C, it doesn't really develop the journey much to really be memorable at the end. The subplot with the battery is sort of a McGruffin, even though it is the reason why the events occur. It felt like an afterthought to me because it wasn't really the focus of the film. I was too busy wondering why June would fall in love with Roy one minute, want to beat the shit out of him the next, and then fall right back in love all over again. I don't think characters in romantic comedies are that confused.
That brings me to the characters here. The development doesn't really exist for anyone other than Roy and June. Roy is the ultimate spy - reckless, cocky, full of expertise and superhuman abilities, and always one step ahead of everyone else. You even question if the guy is a hero or a villain, especially during the first half of the film. Obviously O'Neill was focused on Roy more than anyone. June is less developed, which you can tell because she likes to talk to herself alot to explain how she's feeling so the audience can understand - i.e. lazy screenwriting. We
barely share in her family life and she seems so desperate for a man that it's off-putting at times. I was never sure what to make of June. The only thing that saved the character was Diaz's performance.
And the supporting characters really get the shaft here. June's sister is barely in the film, even though the reason June goes to Boston is for her sister's wedding. Maggie Grace gets barely three minutes of screentime. Rodney, played by Blucas, seems like a foil for Roy over June's affections, but he just comes off as a likeable dolt who also happens to be a firefighter. Not much is done with him. And Fitzgerald is pretty much a predictable action character [I won't spoil it] but Sarsgaard deserved better.
I will say I did enjoy much of the dialogue, as it was witty and funny. So that's a plus.
THINGS I'VE LEARNED WHILE NOT MAKING FUN OF TOM CRUISE'S RELIGION [OKAY...ALMOST]
- Roy and June constantly bump into each other at the airport. Either it means the two are destined to be together, or one of them is a filthy, clumsy bitch who deserves to be smacked around, even if they are holding a baby in their arms!!
...Sorry. Mel Gibson likes to possess me every once in a while. Moving on...
- Roy had to deal with assassins on an airplane. If Harrison Ford was President, those bastards would have gotten off of the plane and it's be the end of that!
- Roy hit a scarecrow while landing a plane. He should be less worried about a brain and more concerned with getting better life insurance.
- Roy managed to survive being squeezed in between two cars inside of a tunnel. That's the power of Xenu, baby!
- Roy wanted a waitress to serve everyone pie inside of a diner as he held June at gunpoint. Only on The L Word does everyone get a piece of pie, Roy. Only on The L Word.
- Roy shot Rodney in the leg as he tried to save June. Man, he used to be able to take more than that. Ever since he broke up with Buffy, his boring ass got weak!
- Roy and June got cozy on a private island. Because islands in the stream, that is what they are. No one in-between, how can they be wrong?
- June followed Roy as he tried to make a deal for the battery. Some women just don't have any faith in their man. I say don't trust a ho. Never trust a ho. Hell, I won't trust a ho 'cause the ho won't trust me.
- Don't steal someone's battery. Unlike it, you won't keep going and going and going when it explodes in your face.
THE FINAL HOWL
KNIGHT AND DAY is a good action film if you don't want to think too much. Basically, perfect for summer escapism. Unfortunately, the story is pretty weak and the characters could have been developed better for the audience to care more about what they were watching. But the acting is solid [especially by Tom Cruise, who's career ISN'T over yet] and the direction is good. It'll make a good date movie and a definite rental when it's released on DVD and Blu-Ray.
Showing posts with label Peter Sarsgaard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter Sarsgaard. Show all posts
Knight and Day (2010) - Review by Fred [The Wolf]
7:44 PM | 2010, 2010 summer movies, action, cameron diaz, comedy, Fred The Wolf, Peter Sarsgaard, Review, tom cruise with 3 comments »Official Trailer and Teaser Poster for the Tom Cruise, Cameron Diaz film "Knight and Day"
8:15 PM | cameron diaz, Knight and Day, News, Peter Sarsgaard, tom cruise with 0 comments »20th Century Fox recently sent us over the trailer and poster for the upcomming Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz film "Knight and Day".
Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz star in the action-comedy KNIGHT AND DAY. During their glamorous and sometimes deadly adventure, nothing and no one even the now fugitive couple are what they seem. Amid shifting alliances and unexpected betrayals, they race across the globe, with their survival ultimately hinging on the battle of truth vs. trust.
Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz star in the action-comedy KNIGHT AND DAY. During their glamorous and sometimes deadly adventure, nothing and no one even the now fugitive couple are what they seem. Amid shifting alliances and unexpected betrayals, they race across the globe, with their survival ultimately hinging on the battle of truth vs. trust.
The film also stars Peter Sarsguaard, Paul Dano, and Maggie Grace.
"Knight and Day" hits theaters on July 2nd
"Knight and Day" Teaser Trailer
"Knight and Day" hits theaters on July 2nd
"Knight and Day" Teaser Trailer
"Mysteries of Pittsburgh" Review - written by Spaldy
1:27 AM | Nick Nolte, Peter Sarsgaard, Pittsburgh, Sienna Miller with 1 comments »Directed by: Rawson Michael Thurber
Written by: Rawson Michael Thurber
Based on the novel by: Michael Chabon
Starring: Jon Foster, Sienna Miller, Peter Sarsgaard, Mena Suvari, Nick Nolte
The beauty of Michael Chabon’s writing is the slow build. The stories are always inventive but deceptively feel normal. Chabon makes the everyday fantastic and the fantastic seem like every day. For the most part, the film “Mysteries of Pittsburgh” follows the lead of Chabon. The pacing is slow and careful, but every portion feels vital to the story.
“Mysteries of Pittsburgh” is the coming of age tale of Art Bechstein (Jon Foster). Art is a recent college graduate and the son of a local gangster (Nick Nolte). Since graduating, Art is spinning his wheels the summer before he embarks on the next step in his life. Art’s father has lined up a job in the financial industry with a relative, and in preparation of his job in the fall, Art is studying to take his section 7 exam to become a trader. In need of money and not particularly pleased about expending any energy to earn it, Art takes a job at the local discount bookstore. Soon Art meets a mysterious woman and her boyfriend and the three become inseparable. The line between friendship and romantic love are soon crossed, as any “last hurrah” summer epic calls for.
This movie is a very slow build, but packs a powerful punch. One would not necessarily expect such a mature and passionate story from the same writer/director who brought you “Dodgeball.” Unless I missed the more dramatic undertones to that comedy (possibly while choking on my popcorn from laughing so hard). We were lucky enough to go to a screen with a Q & A afterwards, and writer/director Rawson Michael Thurber himself joked about the differences between “Mysteries” and “Dodgeball.”
It was when Thurber talked about the book that things came in to focus. While attending film school back in 1997, Thurber met producer Jason Mercer and told him that he wanted to make the novel in to a film one day. Thurber talked a bit about the adaptation process and the difficulty in adapting a first person novel that was “more perception, observation, and description.” Anyone who has tried to adapt a book can give you a long, rambling speech about straddling the line between being faithful to the novel and making a good script. Thurber’s explanation was a bit more succinct, but you could tell he had affection for the novel.
That affection was fairly evident on screen, if a little too thick at times. Though the pacing is true to Chabon’s writing, it still could have been sped up a bit. The writing and adaptation were well done, but I think if the film had been tightened a bit in the direction and editing, the film could have worked better. The cast was remarkable, and even Sienna Miller’s southern accent did not seem to slip in and out all that much. Though I can buy Art’s deep emotional connection and attraction to the couple, I do not think the relationships came across quite as meaningful and believable as they would on the written page. The fault for that only lies partially with Thurber. The rest of the fault lies in the disconnect between a thoughtfully written character study and 90 minute movie that only has dialogue and facial gestures to communicate the same ideas.
Overall the movie is worth seeing, but it takes a bit of patience. For those that appreciate Chabon’s work, this is a nice bit of adaptation. For those unfamiliar with his work, the story might be a bit like a fog; you don’t know where you are or what is going on, but the feel of it is lovely and cool.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

