Showing posts with label cameron diaz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cameron diaz. Show all posts

Lionsgate has released the official trailer and character posters for their upcoming film "What to Expect When Your Expecting", which will hit theaters on May 11th. The film features an all star cast that includes Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Lopez, Elizabeth Banks, Chace Crawford, Brooklyn Decker, Anna Kendrick, Matthew Morrison, Dennis Quaid, and Chris Rock.

Plot Synopsis:

Inspired by the perennial New York Times bestseller of the same name, WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU’RE EXPECTING is a hilarious and heartfelt big screen comedy about five couples whose intertwined lives are turned upside down by the challenges of impending parenthood.

Over the moon about starting a family, TV fitness guru Jules and dance show star Evan find that their high-octane celebrity lives don’t stand a chance against the surprise demands of pregnancy. Baby-crazy author and advocate Wendy gets a taste of her own militant mommy advice when pregnancy hormones ravage her body; while Wendy’s husband, Gary, struggles not to be outdone by his competitive alpha-Dad, who’s expecting twins with his much younger trophy wife, Skyler. Photographer Holly is prepared to travel the globe to adopt a child, but her husband Alex isn’t so sure, and tries to quiet his panic by attending a “dudes” support group, where new fathers get to tell it like it really is. And rival food truck chefs Rosie and Marco’s surprise hook-up results in an unexpected quandary: what to do when your first child comes before your first date?

A kaleidoscopic comedy as universal as it is unpredictable, WHAT TO EXPECT WHEN YOU’RE EXPECTING finds humor and uplift in all the unexpected trials and triumphs of welcoming a child into the world. The film stars Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Lopez, Elizabeth Banks, Chace Crawford, Brooklyn Decker, Anna Kendrick, Matthew Morrison, Dennis Quaid, Chris Rock, Rodrigo Santoro, Ben Falcone and Joe Manganiello.






"What to Expect When Your Expecting": Official Trailer


DIRECTED BY
James Mangold

STARRING
Tom Cruise - Roy Miller
Cameron Diaz - June Havens
Peter Sarsgaard - Fitzgerald
Jordi Molla - Antonio
Viola Davis - Director George
Paul Dano - Simon Feck
Marc Blucas - Rodney
Maggie Grace - April Havens

Genre - Action/Comedy

Running Time - 110 Minutes

Score - 3 Howls Outta 4



Tom Cruise is seen as a lot of things. He's an acting veteran for the past 25+ years. He's an action star. He's a dramatic actor. He's become a comedic actor. He's a Scientologist. He's a complete nutjob. He's delusional about science and the world around him. But the most important part is that he's a huge star with a ton of box office appeal. That's right everyone, Tom Cruise knows how to bring the goods to the silver screen.

Well...that was until his KNIGHT AND DAY, 2010's supposed summer action blockbuster, failed at the box office and has become Cruise's lowest grossing action film to date. With the media backlash [even after his hilarious turn as Lou Grossman at 2010's MTV Movie Awards] and reviews from critics who pretty much bashed KNIGHT AND DAY, the film did a dismal box office take in its first weekend and has dropped dramatically ever since.

Which is a shame, because the film isn't all that bad and is made for the mindless summer blockbuster season. However, there are flaws to KNIGHT AND DAY that make it a possible watch instead of a must-see event.

PLOT
Roy Miller (Tom Cruise), is an FBI agent who may or may not have gone rogue, but is definitely in possession of a ultra-powered battery that everyone seems to want a hold of. He bumps into June Havens (Cameron Diaz) at the airport as she's about to catch a flight to Boston to attend her sister's (Maggie Grace) wedding. While June seems to be smitten with Roy, Roy is using June as a mule for the battery without her knowledge. On the flight, Roy is attacked by assassins and murders them all, taking June as a partner/hostage.

After some hilarity, Roy tells June that FBI agents (Peter Sarsgaard and Viola Davis) want this battery and that they'll tell her that he's insane and not to be trusted. Not sure who to trust at this point, June decides to go along with Roy's story, causing her to be caught up in Roy's life of espionage. Also, they fall in love...like you couldn't guess that.

REVIEW
KNIGHT AND DAY is mostly a fun, mindless action film that is a more comedic and cartoon-ish version of the MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE franchise [also starring Cruise]. You're caught up in the excitement, the visuals are nice, and it's well paced. Unfortunately, there's something missing about KNIGHT AND DAY that makes it a standout.

Let's deal with the positives first. The acting is very solid in KNIGHT AND DAY. Say what you want about Tom Cruise's personal life, but no one can say he's a terrible actor. In fact, he's the best part of the film and carries it quite well. We all know Cruise can handle action and he does that fantastically here, doing most of his own stunts and having fun riding his motorcycle through Spain while bulls chase him and assassins want to shoot his brains out. But Cruise also brings on the funny here, really making Roy a certifiable lunatic in terms of his actions and behavior. This makes him engaging to watch, as he's always confidence, charismatic, and definitely excited to be on screen. I wish he had better material to play off of here, but Cruise makes it work and it's a joy to watch him do what he does best.

Cameron Diaz, who I usually find pretty annoying in most films to be honest, is actually more than okay here. She plays the confused and neurotic June to perfection and actually looks pretty cute doing it. While she does have her action moments, especially towards the end, she's mainly the girlfriend/eye candy role that we usually see in action films. But she handles it well and maintains incredible chemistry with Cruise [who already worked together in 2001's VANILLA SKY]. I wouldn't mind see them do another film together.

The other actors are also very good, but they're not given much to do. I will say that Peter Sarsgaard and Marc Blucas are the standouts in the supporting roles. Sarsgaard's role is very predictable but he does the most with it. And Blucas has a funny scene with both Cruise and Diaz that's one of the better moments in the film.

The direction by James Mangold is also very good, even though it's not his best work as a director. Comparing KNIGHT AND DAY to his work on GIRL, INTERRUPTED, 3:10 TO YUMA remake, and especially WALK THE LINE, isn't really fair. But Mangold shoots the action scenes well [even though I noticed Cruise's stunt double very clearly in one shot that made me laugh] and he keeps the film light-hearted. Mangold seems more focused on the chemistry and relationship between Roy and June rather than all the exciting stuff that's around them, which doesn't hurt the film much at all. In fact, I'm glad Mangold focused more on the comedy than on the action, since it takes stale premise and adds something to it to make it a bit staler. Nice direction all around.

The action sequences are also fun, even if they are pretty much action film norms. From the running of the bulls scene, to the rooftop chase, to shootouts in a warehouse, and to dealing with explosions on an island, they're everything you'd want in a film like this. They're over-the-top and pretty implausible, but the film never takes itself all that seriously anyway, so I have no qualms.

What makes KNIGHT AND DAY suffer, however, is the poor script by Patrick O'Neill. While the film does manage to get to point A to point B to point C, it doesn't really develop the journey much to really be memorable at the end. The subplot with the battery is sort of a McGruffin, even though it is the reason why the events occur. It felt like an afterthought to me because it wasn't really the focus of the film. I was too busy wondering why June would fall in love with Roy one minute, want to beat the shit out of him the next, and then fall right back in love all over again. I don't think characters in romantic comedies are that confused.

That brings me to the characters here. The development doesn't really exist for anyone other than Roy and June. Roy is the ultimate spy - reckless, cocky, full of expertise and superhuman abilities, and always one step ahead of everyone else. You even question if the guy is a hero or a villain, especially during the first half of the film. Obviously O'Neill was focused on Roy more than anyone. June is less developed, which you can tell because she likes to talk to herself alot to explain how she's feeling so the audience can understand - i.e. lazy screenwriting. We barely share in her family life and she seems so desperate for a man that it's off-putting at times. I was never sure what to make of June. The only thing that saved the character was Diaz's performance.

And the supporting characters really get the shaft here. June's sister is barely in the film, even though the reason June goes to Boston is for her sister's wedding. Maggie Grace gets barely three minutes of screentime. Rodney, played by Blucas, seems like a foil for Roy over June's affections, but he just comes off as a likeable dolt who also happens to be a firefighter. Not much is done with him. And Fitzgerald is pretty much a predictable action character [I won't spoil it] but Sarsgaard deserved better.

I will say I did enjoy much of the dialogue, as it was witty and funny. So that's a plus.

THINGS I'VE LEARNED WHILE NOT MAKING FUN OF TOM CRUISE'S RELIGION [OKAY...ALMOST]

- Roy and June constantly bump into each other at the airport. Either it means the two are destined to be together, or one of them is a filthy, clumsy bitch who deserves to be smacked around, even if they are holding a baby in their arms!!

...Sorry. Mel Gibson likes to possess me every once in a while. Moving on...

- Roy had to deal with assassins on an airplane. If Harrison Ford was President, those bastards would have gotten off of the plane and it's be the end of that!

- Roy hit a scarecrow while landing a plane. He should be less worried about a brain and more concerned with getting better life insurance.

- Roy managed to survive being squeezed in between two cars inside of a tunnel. That's the power of Xenu, baby!

- Roy wanted a waitress to serve everyone pie inside of a diner as he held June at gunpoint. Only on The L Word does everyone get a piece of pie, Roy. Only on The L Word.

- Roy shot Rodney in the leg as he tried to save June. Man, he used to be able to take more than that. Ever since he broke up with Buffy, his boring ass got weak!

- Roy and June got cozy on a private island. Because islands in the stream, that is what they are. No one in-between, how can they be wrong?

- June followed Roy as he tried to make a deal for the battery. Some women just don't have any faith in their man. I say don't trust a ho. Never trust a ho. Hell, I won't trust a ho 'cause the ho won't trust me.

- Don't steal someone's battery. Unlike it, you won't keep going and going and going when it explodes in your face.

THE FINAL HOWL
KNIGHT AND DAY is a good action film if you don't want to think too much. Basically, perfect for summer escapism. Unfortunately, the story is pretty weak and the characters could have been developed better for the audience to care more about what they were watching. But the acting is solid [especially by Tom Cruise, who's career ISN'T over yet] and the direction is good. It'll make a good date movie and a definite rental when it's released on DVD and Blu-Ray.



20th Century Fox recently sent us over the trailer and poster for the upcomming Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz film "Knight and Day".

Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz star in the action-comedy KNIGHT AND DAY. During their glamorous and sometimes deadly adventure, nothing and no one even the now fugitive couple are what they seem. Amid shifting alliances and unexpected betrayals, they race across the globe, with their survival ultimately hinging on the battle of truth vs. trust.
The film also stars Peter Sarsguaard, Paul Dano, and Maggie Grace.

"Knight and Day" hits theaters on July 2nd

"Knight and Day" Teaser Trailer



I feel really bad for writer/director Richard Kelly. All three films he has made thus far have been treated with contempt and dismissed before they even made it to the big screen. Granted, “Donnie Darko” (which has since become one of my all time favorite movies) has achieved a well deserved cult following, but it bombed upon its original release. Having come out just after the events of September 11th, 2001, no one wanted to see an airplane in any kind of trouble (see the movie, you’ll understand). Then there was “Southland Tales” which was greeted with a tremendous chorus of boos upon its premiere at the Cannes Film Festival. But while movie suffered from being overly ambitious, you still had to admire Kelly’s ambition to a certain extent. Still, “Southland Tales” belly flopped when finally released in only a handful of theaters.



Now we have his latest movie, “The Box.” This one has immediately become well known for getting the rare Cinemascore of F from filmgoers. C’mon! You cannot make me believe that people as a whole think that badly of it! I’m not sure how Cinemascore works exactly, but I imagine there are other factors at work there other than the film being good or bad. I wonder how Kelly deals with all this negativity constantly being thrown in his direction.



That being said, “The Box” is not the great movie that “Donnie Darko” is, but it is still a fascinating one that held my attention throughout its running time. The movie is based upon a short story by Richard Matheson called “Button, Button” which itself was adapted into an episode of the 80’s incarnation of “The Twilight Zone.” Cameron Diaz and James Marsden star as a married couple living in Connecticut back in the 1970’s. Cameron plays Norma Lewis, a teacher of literature at a local school where we see her discussing Jean Paul Sartre’s “No Exit,” a play whose themes are echoed throughout. James’ character of Arthur Lewis works for NASA and is confident that he is about to be selected for astronaut training. At the same time, Arthur is also working on a special molding for his wife’s foot which got horribly disfigured when she was very young. They appear to be your normal happy couple with a son, and the dad drives an incredibly cool corvette you could only wish you owned.



But then the roof caves in for the both of them (this always seems to happen with the nicest of people in the movies). Norma discovers the school she works at will be cutting back on tuition which will affect her financially, and Arthur finally gets the letter from NASA confirming that he failed his psych test, and as a result will never be able to become an astronaut. One crushing blow after another is the last thing this family needs as they are both already living way beyond their means. Doesn’t sound all that different from a lot of families I see on television today who have been evicted from their homes.



During this troubling time, they find a package that was left at their doorstep. Who left it there, they do not know. In the package is a brown box with no real special features to it other than a red button that is locked in a little glass dome on the top. Both Norma and Arthur examine the inside of it and find no real working parts, nothing to indicate if anyone has pushed the button or not. The next day, Norma is met by a kindly man named Arlington Steward (Frank Langella) whose kind demeanor alleviates the shock upon seeing that his face has a hideous scar on the side. Arlington tells Norma that if she or her husband presses the button, two things will happen; first, someone they do not know will die, and they will not know how. Second, they will receive a briefcase filled with $1,000,000 in cash. He gives the two of them 24 hours to decide whether or not to push the red button. Either way, he says he will return to collect the box at which point it will be reprogrammed and given to someone else.



The premise of “The Box” immediately reminded me of Adrian Lyne’s “Indecent Proposal.” That film came out in the 90’s and starred Woody Harrelson, Demi Moore, and Robert Redford. In that one, Redford’s character offers the married couple of Woody and Demi a million dollars if he can spend a night alone with Demi. We all know what decision they made (there would be no movie otherwise), and the rest of the movie deals with the aftermath of their collective choice. Fear and jealousy threatens to tear them apart throughout.



With the added elements of the supernatural and of Marsden’s character working on a special machine that will be landed on Mars, “The Box” could have been called “Indecent Proposal of the 3rd Kind.”



Now that Kelly has made three feature length movies, I can see similar themes running through his work. Kelly seems particularly interested in supernatural forces at work which are never easily explained, and he even has one of the characters say at one point:



“I love a good mystery.”



In addition to the supernatural, he deals with end of the world scenarios, and of human sacrifices that seemingly need to be made for the good of others. None of the protagonists in his films ever get off easy. In fact, they are the ones who seem to suffer the worst of everyone. And of course, there are always the morality issues that tear away at the characters. In “The Box,” it is whether or not we should push the button. Does it make it easier to push it if the person who dies is someone they do not know? What if that unknown person to them is a murderer or a rapist? Or are all these questions simple excuses to take advantage of a big payday that will take care of their financial worries? We’re all looking for some great excuse to solve our problems quickly rather than slowly. But in the end, we reap what we sow, and we can never be fully prepared for the consequences we know that we will eventually face.



Arlington is asked why he brings a box to peoples’ houses. He basically says our lives revolve around boxes of all kinds. We live in a house that is essentially a box, we go to our jobs and sit in our cubicles which is essentially a box (a suffocating one at that), and when we die we are buried in a box. To say that the box is in many ways symbolic to our lives would be an understatement. The big question is if we can think outside of the box, and there may be a certain point in our lives where we stop doing that out of futility or a cynical nature.



Cameron Diaz is really a better actress than people tend to give her credit for. The last couple of years have had her stuck doing generic comedies like “What Happens In Vegas” among others. Cameron shot her way into our lives opposite Jim Carrey in “The Mask,” and she has taken on many different roles since then. I am in agreement with those who say she should have gotten a nomination for “There’s Something About Mary.” Don’t tell me she was just playing herself!



In “The Box,” Diaz gives an understated performance that does not have her overacting or going over the top. She slips into the role with relative ease and is very believable as a regular housewife with a child. She looks beautiful in certain scenes while maintaining a demeanor that feels very down to earth. The thing I have always liked about Cameron Diaz is that she is not afraid to de-glam herself for certain roles like the one she played in “Being John Malkovich.” Had “The Box” received a better reception upon its initial release, I would like to believe that she would have gotten more respect for her performance here.



James Marsden is good here as the husband Arthur, but he does come across as a little stiff at times. Still, he gives us a father who is not your simple one-dimensional dad who cares more about work than his own family. The dynamic he shares Cameron’s character feels genuine, and his character is just as complex. His very last moments in “The Box” are especially well played as he is forced to make a choice where the odds have him suffering eternal damnation.



But the performance that really makes “The Box” work is given by Frank Langella. If the wrong actor was cast in this role, it could have seriously messed up the whole movie, and that’s regardless of how the other actors compare. The character could have been completely laughable if played too broadly, and the plot would have been rendered as utter rubbish. But Director Kelly made a brilliant choice in casting Langella as the strange man who comes seemingly out of nowhere. From “Dave” to “Frost/Nixon,” Langella has always had a dramatically foreboding presence about him, and serves this movie perfectly. His character is not evil and comes across as a polite gentleman no matter how devious you think he becomes.



Richard Kelly takes his time with “The Box” and doesn’t start with the payoff like every other film made today. He builds up to it from the get go, and the movie keeps you intrigued in that it does not give away all its secrets by the end. This is one of those movies where watching it once is not enough as there is still a lot to take in. “The Box” is of course not without its flaws, it does drag at times to where it could have used some tightening and additional editing. Even “Southland Tales” didn’t feel quite as long as this one does. Still, “The Box” is still a good movie that hopefully will find its audience on cable and DVD like all his other movies.



But c’mon! Let’s show Richard Kelly some more respect. He’s doing something different and interesting. Stop giving him crap until you actually see his movies!



Hang in there Richard!



*** out of ****