"Evil Dead" Blu-Ray Review - Written by Anthony T
8:58 PM | Blu-ray Reviews, Evil Dead, Remake, Reviews, Sony Pictures Home Entertainment with 0 comments »Continue the trend of reviews of remakes today. Going into this year, “Evil Dead” was one of the films that I was most curious about considering that the original film is one the great horror films ever made in my opinion. Even though there was good press from horror sites, I still was cautious about it.
The film follows a group of friends who head to the woods in hope of curing Mia’s (Jane Levy) drug addiction. Once they get into the house, they stumble upon the powerful book that can summon the undead. A person from the group accidently reads from the book and accidently releases unspeakable evil. The friends are forced to fight this bloodthirsty force before they become possessed by it. “Evil Dead” also co-stars Shiloh Fernandez (Deadgirl), Lou Taylor Pucci (Carriers) and Jessica Lewis (Cloverfield).
Going into “Evil Dead”, I wasn’t expecting to enjoy this as much as I did. I liked the original and hold it in high regard, but I was very surprised that this was equally as good as the original.
One of the reason that made the “Evil Dead” remake work was Fede Alvarez’s direction. I was surprised that I enjoyed the direction considering that this is his first feature film. Alvarez does a very good job with the way that builds tension to the scenes. It allows for some of the horrific scenes feel scary and intense. The gore scenes were also done effectively. Alvarez and his effects team did a very good job in making the gore feel more horrifying than cartoonish. It made for a very effective horror film.
The acting here was very better than I expected going in. Alvarez gets very good performances from his main cast including Jane Levy, as the heroine Mia. Levy does a very good job making the character interesting, as you’re interested in the character and her struggles. It was a key component to making the character work for me. The supporting performances were also very good, as both Shiloh Fernandez, Lou Taylor Pucci were very good, as they carried the film well during the time when the main character was possessed. Levy’s performance and the supporting performances is what helps make the film work so well from an acting standpoint.
The screenplay written by Alverez and Rodo Sayagues was very good. I liked that they didn’t try and copy things from the original movie. This film felt different. First, I liked that they didn’t include Ash in the film. I know that this might anger fans of the original. But if the character was in the film, you would had some sort of backlash that would’ve been a distraction for some as Bruce Campbell should only be playing Ash in the first place. The other thing that made the screenplay work was the fact that it had its terrifying moments. The writers did a very good job making the scenes intense. They were well thought out and had tension to them that generated scares. It made the film fun to watch.
Blu-Ray Extras:
The first featurette is “Directing the Dead”. The featurette focuses on the film’s director Fede Alvarez. It features interviews from Alvarez and couple members of the cast. It goes into Alvarez’s direction and how he approached this reboot. It also shows how he created some of the film’s most gory scenes, which made it more interesting.
The next featurette is “Making Life Difficult”. It goes into some of the intense scenes were created and how it took its toll on the film’s cast and crew. Interesting featurette on this subject.
After that, the next featurette is “Being Mia”. A good featurette that goes into the film’s main character. It features a brief interviews with actress Jane Levy and director Fede Alvarez along with some behind the scenes footage that Levy shot during the filming of the film.
There are also a couple of Blu-Ray Exclusives on the disc.
First, it’s the cast and crew commentary track that features Director Fede Alvarez, co-writer Royo Sayagues, actor Lou Taylor Pucci and actresses Jane Levy and Jessica Lewis. It’s a good and entertaining commentary track. They all going into the production of the film. Whether its came from an actor’s perspective or from a writing and directing perspective, there were a lot of stories about the behind the scenes of the film. It also provided interesting information why certain scenes were cut or altered, which made it even more interesting. This is worth checking out, as this gives an interesting look of the film’s production.
The next featurette is “Evil Dead: The Reboot”. This was a very good featurette that fans of the original and new one will like. It features interview from producers Rob Tapert, Bruce Campbell, writer Royo Sayagues, actress Jane Levy and director Fede Alverez. They went into the behind the scene of how the reboot was conceived and talked about the comparisons of the old film to this film.
The Blu-Ray exclusives wrap up with “Unleashing the Evil”. The featurette goes into the book of the dead that was used in the film. An interesting featurette that features interview from producer Bruce Campbell and actor Lou Taylor Pucci, as they talk about the book behind the demonic hauntings in the film.
After that, the disc wraps up with trailers for upcoming Sony Pictures releases.
Final Summary.
I hope we get to see Fede Alvarez direct another horror film, as his direction is one of the reason that makes this reboot work so well. “Evil Dead” is as terrifying as the original. It’s a frightening thrill ride that keeps a hold of you from start to finish.
Review Rating: Five Stars.
Blu-Ray Extras: Four Extras.
Syfy's remake of "The Philadelphia Experiment" hits DVD and Blu-Ray
9:35 AM | DVD/Blu-Ray News, Remake, syfy, The Philadelphia Experiment with 0 comments »Truth is sometimes stranger than fiction.
On June 11th, Anchor Bay Entertainment releases The Philadelphia Experiment on Blu-ray™ and DVD. This reimagining of the time travel cult classic originally aired on the Syfy channel and stars Nicholas Lea (“Kyle XY”), Michael Paré (of the original 1984 film), Ryan Robbins (“Falling Skies”), Emilie Ullerup (“Sanctuary”), Gina Holden (SAW 3D) and Malcolm McDowell (A Clockwork Orange, Silent Night). The SRP for the Blu-ray™ is $24.99 and $19.98 for DVD. The pre-book is May 15th.
In 1943, a secret government project attempted to create a cloaking device that would make warships invisible. But during the first test, the USS Eldridge successfully vanished...and could not be found again. 70 years later, the Navy destroyer momentarily reappears on a Pennsylvania runway allowing the sole surviving crewman to escape and a local lawman to board. What is behind a sinister reactivation of the project? Where will the massive ship materialize next? And what will become of two men trapped in a time/space catastrophe?
The Philadelphia Experiment will delight fans of the original film and create new debate among conspiracy theorists about this allegedly true military operation from the past. Whether you believe it or not – get ready for one incredibly strange trip!
"Silent Night" Review - Written by Anthony T
10:48 PM | Remake, Reviews, Silent Night with 0 comments »I figured that since it’s late on this Christmas night, I would have a review of a Christmas themed horror film on the site for you horror fans. The remake of the 1984 cult classic horror film “Silent Night, Deadly Night” called “Silent Night”.
The film follows a deputy (Jamie King), who is haunted by the lost of her husband. She is called into work on Christmas Eve, when the town is preparing its annual Christmas parade. But she and the town’s sheriff (Malcolm McDowell) discover that there is a killer Santa on the loose. He’s intent on murdering anyone that he thinks is committing sins and not being nice. Now, the town’s sheriff and deputy must stop this killer Santa, before he strikes again.
Going into this film, I was very interested in seeing this film. I’ve enjoyed Steven C Miller’s previous films “Automation Transfusion” and “The Aggression Scale”. I had some expectation going into this film, but I never thought that I would enjoy it more than his earlier film this year “The Aggression Scale”.
One of the reasons that I liked this film, Miller handles the direction aspects. I liked how, he was able to make the film suspenseful through the pace of the film and the way that he directs the action scenes. Miller does a very good job building it, by making the scenes chaotic and shocking. The scenes felt shocking and made me question how film got an R rating with the level of violence that this film has. It gave the film its edgy feel. The other thing that I liked about his direction was the way that he handles the performances. Miller does a very good job getting the cast to really make their characters work. The performances really helped made the film fun to watch.
If there was one performance that I liked out of all of them, it would be Jamie King’s performance as the film’s lead. I liked how, she was able to make the character interesting. King brought emotion to the role that helped made her character engaging, instead of feeling very dull which could have easily happen with the character. It also helped make the heroine aspects work so well in the performance, Its performances like this and her previous horror film “Mother’s Day” that makes her a very good actress in this genre.
The Screenplay written by Jayson Rothwell did a very good job with providing some shock moments that made you cringed. He does a very good job in getting those moments to work, because of the way that he created some of those scenes in the writing process. There are some very effective death scenes that you don’t see in many of these horror films these days. It’s so creative that it brings a level of shock value that you don’t see often. The other thing that I liked about the screenplay was the way that it focuses on its main character and how conflicted she gets towards any situation. It makes the characters interesting and you’re interested in the heroine. That’s what helped made this screenplay work.
“Slient Night” is a gory film that is filled with inventive kills and has a story that keeps you interested. Fans of the original “Silent Night, Deadly Night” will enjoy this.
Review Rating: Four Stars
Open Road Films has send us over the official poster for "Silent House", which stars Elizabeth Olsen. The film is being directed by Chris Kentis and Laura Lau, who are known for the chilling film "Open Water" and is based on the Uruguayan film, "The Silent House". "Silent House will be hitting theaters on March 9th.
For more information on this film, you can visit the film's official website at: http://whyisthishappeningtome.net/
Plot Synopsis:
SILENT HOUSE is a uniquely unsettling horror thriller starring Elizabeth Olsen as Sarah, a young woman who finds herself sealed inside her family's secluded lake house. With no contact to the outside world, and no way out, panic turns to terror as events become increasingly ominous in and around the house. Directed by filmmaking duo Chris Kentis and Laura Lau, SILENT HOUSE uses meticulous camera choreography to take the audience on a tension-filled, real time journey, experienced in a single uninterrupted shot.
From the directors of Open Water and starring Elizabeth Olsen (Martha Marcy May Marlene), SILENT HOUSE is based on "La Casa Muda", the official Uruguayan entry in the Best Foreign Language Film category to the 84th Academy Awards. The film releases in theaters March 9th, 2012!
Fantasia 2011: "Don't Be Afraid of the Dark" Official Trailer and Screening
7:12 PM | 2011 Fantasia Film Festival, Don't Be Afraid of the Dark, Guillermo Del Toro, Remake with 0 comments »
Film District recently provided us with the offical poster and trailer for their upcoming release "Don't Be Afraid of the Dark", which is having it's canadian premiere at this year's Fantasia Film Festival. The Guillermo del Toro co-produced and co written film is a remake of the 1974 ABC TV movie of the same name. The film will be released in the U.S. on August 26th.
Plot Synopsis:
Blackwood Manor has new tenants. While architect Alex Hurst (Guy Pearce) and his new girlfriend Kim (Katie Holmes) restore their Gothic mansion's period interiors, Alex’s young daughter Sally (Bailee Madison)—neglected by her real mother and brushed aside by the careerist father—can investigate the macabre history and dark corners of the estate. Spurring Sally's investigation are the voices—rasping whispers who call out to her from the basement, who promise her understanding and friendship, who are so very hungry and would like to be set free. When Sally gives in to her curiosity, she opens a gateway into a hellish underworld from which an army of beady-eyed, sharp-clawed monsters emerge, small in size but endless in number: the homunculi. Confronted with the horror that now threatens to taker her life and destroy her family, Sally desperately tries to warn the whole house, but there's just one problem: no one believes her. Will she make them understand in time, or will they become another chapter in the centuries-long horror story of Blackwood Manor?
Based on the 1973 telefilm that Guillermo del Toro believes to be the scariest TV production ever made, DON’T BE AFRAID OF THE DARK was co-written and co-produced by del Toro and directed by Troy Nixey. Akin to PAN’S LABYRINTH, DON’T BE AFRAID OF THE DARK focuses on a young girl’s struggle against menacing and terrifying forces.
Upcoming Screenings:
August 4th, 2011 / 9:10 pm / Hall Theater / Montreal Canada
"Don't Be Afraid of the Dark": Official Trailer
Official Poster: "Conan The Barbarian
6:15 PM | Conan the Barbarian 3D, News, Remake with 1 comments »
Lionsgate unveiled the official poster today for the upcoming "Conan The Barbarian" remake, which is set to hit theaters on August 19th.
Plot Synopsis:
“I live. I love. I slay…I am content.”
- Conan The Barbarian
The most legendary Barbarian of all time is back this Summer. Having thrived and evolved for eight consecutive decades in the public imagination- in prose and graphics, on the big screen and small, in games and properties of all kinds- Conan’s exploits in the Hyborian Age now come alive like never before in a colossal 3D action-adventure film.
A quest that begins as a personal vendetta for the fierce Cimmerian warrior soon turns into an epic battle against hulking rivals, horrific monsters, and impossible odds, as Conan realizes he is the only hope of saving the great nations of Hyboria from an encroaching reign of supernatural evil.
Deftly adapted from the original works of Robert E. Howard and faithful to the mythology and psychology of his iconic character, CONAN THE BARBARIAN stars Jason Momoa, Rachel Nichols, Stephen Lang, Rose McGowan, Saïd Taghmaoui and Ron Perlman. The film is directed by Marcus Nispel, and written by Thomas Dean Donnelly & Joshua Oppenheimer and Sean Hood.
"28 Weeks Later" Director Set To Direct "The Crow" Remake
9:40 PM | Juan Carlos Fresnadillo., Remake, The Crow with 0 comments »Relativity Media announced today that a director has finally been announced for "The Crow" remake and it's a very interesting choice.
Press Release:
Relativity Media’s President of Worldwide Production Tucker Tooley and Edward R. Pressman, the prolific producer behind The Crow franchise, announced today they have closed a deal for Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (28 Weeks Later) to direct a re-invention of The Crow, the 1994 smash hit film based on the comic book series and comic strip by James O’Barr. Relativity and Pressman will be teaming with Spain-based Apaches Entertainment on the production which is targeted to start in Fall 2011.
Fresnadillo is best known for directing 28 Weeks Later, the post-apocalyptic horror sequel to 28 Days Later, which he co-wrote and produced with long-time producing partner, Apaches Entertainment’s Enrique López Lavigne. Fresnadillo also directed the critically-acclaimed Spanish-language film Intacto and is currently in post-production on Intruders starring Clive Owen, also being produced by Apaches Entertainment.
Fresnadillo will collaboratively develop the script once a writer is attached to adapt the screenplay. Casting has not yet been announced.
The film is being produced by Edward R. Pressman, Jeff Most, Relativity’s CEO Ryan Kavanaugh, and Apaches’ Enrique López Lavigne and Belén Atienza. Relativity’s Tooley (The Fighter) will serve as executive producer. José Ibáñez, Pressman Film Corporation’s Jon Katz, and Apaches’ Jesús de la Vega will serve as co-producers.
The Crow adaptation will be a reboot of the iconic cult character Eric Draven, who’s resurrected as The Crow to avenge his wife’s murder so he can reunite with her in the hereafter, as first envisioned by graphic novelist James O’Barr.
“Juan Carlos Fresnadillo is an incredibly talented and imaginative filmmaker,” said Tooley. “We are thrilled to have him at the helm and are excited to work with both Pressman and Apaches on what we all believe will be a compelling and innovative reimagining of The Crow.”
Producer Edward R. Pressman remarks, "The original Crow was groundbreaking cinema; its gothic visual and musical ideas influenced a generation and cinema itself. With Juan Carlos, we have every confidence that his new Crow will have a similar impact on the contemporary audience."
Film Clips: "Piranha (2010)"
10:58 PM | DVD News, Film Clips, News, piranha, Remake with 0 comments »From director Alexandre Aja (The Hills Have Eyes) comes the new action thriller PIRANHA 3D. Every year the population of sleepy Lake Victoria explodes from 5,000 to 50,000 for Spring Break, a riot of sun and drunken fun. But this year, there's something more to worry about than hangovers and complaints from local old timers; a new type of terror is about to be cut loose on Lake Victoria. After a sudden underwater tremor sets free scores of the prehistoric man-eating fish, an unlikely group of strangers must band together to stop themselves from becoming fish food for the areas new razor-toothed residents. The film stars Jessica Szohr (Gossip Girl), Steven R. McQueen (The Vampire Diaries), Elisabeth Shue, Jerry O'Connell, Ving Rhames, Adam Scott, Richard Dreyfuss, Christopher Lloyd, and Kelly Brook.
"Piranha (2010)" Clip #1 - Boat Crash
"Piranha (2010)" Clip #2 - Chew on This
"Piranha (2010)" Clip #3 - Something In The Water
"Piranha (2010)" Clip #4 - Because of Me
"Piranha (2010)" Clip #5 - Night Discovery
Stills and Official Trailer for "Let Me In"
8:27 PM | Let Me In, Matt Reeves, News, Remake with 0 comments »

A Nightmare On Elm Street (2010) - Written by Fred [The Wolf]
2:39 PM | 2010, Fred The Wolf, horror, MIchael Bay, Remake, Review, WTF? Vault with 5 comments »
DIRECTED BY
Samuel Bayer
STARRING
Jackie Earle Haley - Freddy Krueger
Rooney Mara - Nancy Holbrook
Kyle Gallner - Quentin O'Grady
Katie Cassidy - Kris Fowles
Thomas Dekker - Jesse Braun
Kellan Lutz - Dean Russell
Clancy Brown - Alan Smith
Connie Britton - Gwen Holbrook
Genre - Horror/Slasher
Running Time - 95 Minutes
Score - 1 Howl Outta 4
In 1984, Wes Craven unleashed his horror masterpiece to an unsuspecting audience: A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET. The idea of a killer murdering you in your dreams was an original, and downright frightening, idea that gave many people nightmares once the film was over. It created a horror icon in Freddy Krueger, played perfectly with malicious glee by Robert Englund, and since has brought us 6 sequels [7 if you consider 2003's FREDDY VS. JASON as part of the NIGHTMARE timeline] that had varied levels of success both creatively and commercially.
With the mega-success of FREDDY VS. JASON, I was hoping it would steer away ideas of a future remake for the franchise, as that film revigorized the character and had potential to bring in other horror icons into the mix for some entertaining times. Unfortunately, that was not to be. Sequel discussions for FvJ went down by the wayside. And the fact that other major horror franchises were being "rebooted" such as THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, HALLOWEEN, and FRIDAY THE 13TH, it was inevitable that A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET would get its own makeover.
Now I don't hate remakes. In fact, I feel many horror films could use updates because the ideas could be improved upon or they're just outdated and could use a modern touch. However, A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET was one of those films that didn't need a remake. It's still as fantastic as it was 26 years ago and doesn't need improvement. But it was announced and nothing could be done about it. Jackie Earle Haley of LITTLE CHILDREN and WATCHMEN was playing Krueger, plus a good cast of young actors gave me hope that the film could be a bit decent. But then I forgot that Michael Bay and Platinum Dunes, producers of some of the worst remakes in history, was behind this, dashing those hopes.
But I saw A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET 2010 with an open mind, hoping it would be as close to the original sequels as possible. Unfortunately, the film is a massive disappointment on many levels.
PLOT
Every horror fan knows the plot to this film. Several teenagers from Springwood, Ohio are having nightmares of the same burnt man with a single glove that's highlighted with razor sharp knives. It turns out this man is Fred Krueger (Jackie Earle Haley), a former groundskeeper at a pre-school who supposedly molested and possibly murdered some of the students. The parents of these children lynched Freddy by burning him, supposedly ending the terror. But now Freddy has gained supernatural abilities that allow him to step inside the dream world, attacking his former students (who are now High Schoolers) for telling on him. And if he kills you in your dreams, you die for real. Can Freddy be stopped or will the nightmares continue?
REVIEW
I wasn't expecting much out of this remake. And my expectations were pretty much met. A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET 2010 is an extremely disappointing revision of a classic film that's still highly regarded for being creative, memorable, and downright chilling. None of those adjectives work for the remake, as it's uninspired, forgettable, and overall lazy as hell. What went so wrong with this film?
Let's start with the main culprit: the screenplay. Now let me get the positives out of the way. I liked the idea of the "micro-nap". This is a legit phenomenon, as we micro-nap whenever we feel drowsy or daydream [or zone out]. It's never been addressed in the other films, so I thought it was clever to see how powerful sleep is. There's no way to escape dreaming even if you stay up for days on end. The exhaustion will take over no matter what, making one vulnerable to Freddy's attack. It definitely helped pick up the last half of the film, especially in the supermarket scene, which I actually liked. I do wish the idea of "what's real and what's not" when it came to this sub-plot was explored deeper. It was easy to tell when it was real and when it was a dream. I think it should have blurred the lines a bit more to really make it an effective narrative tool.
I also appreciate that there was an attempt to revise the Freddy origin. The question of whether he was innocent of pedophilia was an interesting one. Am I a fan of this direction? No, as I feel Freddy would have revelled in raping and murdering children. After all, he was the son of a 100 maniacs. He has every right to be an evil bastard. But I was okay with the fact that maybe he was burned for all the wrong reasons - if the screenwriters had actually let that simmer until the very end. Instead, it's brought up and then revealed right away that he was guilty as sin. What's the point in even bringing it up then if you're just gonna give it away so quickly? Again, it was an appealing attempt but it wasn't executed well enough to have any sort of impact.
As for the rest of the story itself, it's pretty much "been there-done that". It's so generic that I felt better off just watching the original. In fact, it's the same exact shit! I thought the point of a remake is to not only stay true to the source material, but actually change things up enough so the old story feels new again? This remake doesn't really do that. In fact, when I see the same scenes taken from the original and they're done WORSE than in 1984, a part of me dies inside.
But yeah, the script was very pedestrian. No character development for much of anyone in this film. People get killed and do the other characters really react to it? No, they're more concerned about themselves and how Freddy will kill them. For a group of friends, they seemed really disconnected from each other. And they were all interchangable. Yeah, some were more of a douchebag than others, but they were all pretty much stereotypes. I expect that in a FRIDAY THE 13TH movie, not in a NIGHTMARE film. Freddy Krueger obviously was the most developed (with Quentin and Nancy right behind him), but even he could have used more fleshing out. The dialogue was bland and awkward at times, as everyone sounded the same for the most part. The scene where Nancy and Quentin confront Nancy's mother was just bizarre. It felt so forced and the information given SHOULD have been effective. But it just made me roll my eyes and laugh. What a waste. I mean, you had EIGHT films to work from and we're given this? I honestly didn't give a fuck about anyone in this film and I was rooting for Freddy the whole time. That doesn't make me sadistic. That makes me smart enough to know that the screenplay sucked.
Then we have the CGI. Wow, this CGI looked really cheap. The scene where
Freddy invades through the wall as he attempts to scare Nancy looks terrible in comparison to the scene in the original. It was like a cartoon! And the Tina death scene that's recreated for one of the characters is also lame in comparison. In the original, it was dragged out and looked really brutal and realistic, making it highly effective. Here, the death plays out and then the character is pretty much bouncing off walls like it's a pinball machine and gets slashed. The end. Ugh. I will say some of the transitions between reality and the dream were nicely done, especially in the supermarket scene and the scene at the jailhouse. And I enjoyed seeing the body bag scene again. I just felt that the effects should have been more organic as the CGI just hurt the film more than it helped it. When the effects for FREDDY VS. JASON, which were done in CGI by the way, look more big budget and actually enhanced the film and story more than a reboot does seven years later, something went wrong when it came to the special effects unit.And for a rated R movie, it sure lacked in nudity and gore. I don't consider seeing Kyle Gallner in a speedo sexually stimulating. Now if Katie Cassidy was in her underwear, that would have been something! And the kills were bland. No creativity whatsoever.
The direction by Samuel Bayer was hit and miss for me. Let me just say that I thought the film had nice cinematography. A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET 2010 is a pretty film, with nice polish and beautiful framing and composition. I think it may have been too polished for a film like this, but it didn't bug me. I also thought Bayer had a decent eye for things and he did show some style when it came to directing scenes. But this is a horror film and I'm expecting to get scared, or at least creeped out, by something. I don't consider making the sound design louder when people pop up on screen from off-frame so people can jump out of their seats to be scary. I expect tension. I expect suspense. Bayer, a music video director who worked on Nirvana's "Smell Like Teen Spirit" and Green Day's "Wake Me Up Before September Ends", doesn't display any of this. I wasn't scared once. I wasn't even creeped out. If you're gonna attempt to make Freddy Krueger scary again rather than funny, at least try and match the tone for the rest of the film. Also, the pacing was way off in this film. The middle portion almost bored me because it was centered more on Quentin and Nancy, who weren't really developed enough for me to care all that much about them. I just thought it was lazy filmmaking for the most part, even though Bayer tried to infuse some energy into his work.
The acting was probably the highlight of the movie. While Robert Englund will always be Freddy Krueger for all us horror fans, Jackie Earle Haley didn't do a bad job replacing him. In fact, he was the best part of the film for me. He made Freddy more menacing than the character had been in years, which was a nice touch. The voice didn't bother me all that much [the make up is another story], even though he spoke really slow for some reason. But the guy is a great actor and he did his best with the role. I think if he was allowed to give the character his own interpretation, it would have been a more interesting performance.
The rest of the actors were given lame characters but did the best they could do. Rooney Mara is a better actress than Heather Langenkamp, but I actually prefer Langenkamp as N
ancy. I will say that Mara gave a subtle, more intellectual performance as the final girl. I liked what she brought to the table. I wish the screenplay gave her more things to do. Kyle Gallner played the Johnny Depp role very well. Out of all the teens, I liked him the most as he had the most depth and actually did things that made sense. Gallner and Mara also had some cute chemistry together. Katie Cassidy did her best as Kris[Tina], even though she seemed to force too much emotion in certain scenes, making her performance sometimes unbelievable. Thomas Dekker played the asshole. Nothing more, nothing less. And Kellan Lutz wasn't bad as Dean. Can't really judge him since he's not in the film all that much. And I gotta say that Clancy Brown and Connie Britton was really wasted in their parental roles. These two fine actors deserved better.THINGS I'VE LEARNED WHILE HOPING THIS REMAKE IS NOTHING BUT A DREAM
- Dean "killed himself" by slicing his own throat with a knife. Not surprising really. I felt suicidal after watching TWILIGHT. I can't imagine how it feels to actually star in it.
- Don't fall asleep in class. You'll get Freddy Krueger's attention. That A+ is not worth dying over.
- Kris wears a number 10 shirt to bed. And a 10 she is! Ooh baby! ::drools::
- If your dog is missing and it's the middle of the night, don't bother looking for him. He's probably been killed by Freddy. Or better yet, he's making a fine cuisine at an Asian restaurant. Either way, you'll be barking up the wrong tree.
- In Nancy's dream, it snows in her room. The same thing happens in Lindsay Lohan's dreams, but she snorts it before anyone is able to interpret it.
- Jesse had the boiler room dream, wincing and crying after Freddy taunted him. This guy is supposed to save the world from Skynet? Hasta la vista, future!
- Freddy scared Nancy at the supermarket. Damn, just show her how high milk and meat prices have gotten! That'll put the fear in anyone!
- Nancy has to dream in order to pull out Freddy from the dream and bring him into reality. Um, isn't pulling out what got Freddy in trouble to begin with...?
- If you're going to hide from a horror villain, don't do it inside a closet. Unless you're Jamie Lee Curtis, R. Kelly, or Ricky Martin, you're fucked!
THE FINAL HOWL

A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET is another disappointing remake by Platinum Dunes. After thinking about it a couple of days, my thoughts on this film just soured. It's one of those rare cases where the review came about and changed my original score for it. It's lazy and bland - two things that a NIGHTMARE film should not be. Yeah, FREDDY'S DEAD was horrible but at least it wasn't bland. Pretty much on par with the FRIDAY THE 13TH remake, showing us that sometimes a remake isn't a good idea. I think the only new information I gathered from this reboot is that Michael Bay is truly Freddy Krueger's worst nightmare. Stick with the original stuff. You're not missing anything worthwhile with this one.
Three New Clips and a Featurette for "The Crazies"
9:19 PM | News, Remake, The Crazies with 0 comments »Overture Film recently send us over three clip and a featurette clip for "The crazies" remake which is in theaters now.
Imagine living in a small town where everything is safe and happy…until suddenly it isn’t. Imagine your friends and neighbors going quickly and horrifically insane. In a terrifying tale of the “American Dream” gone horribly wrong, four friends find themselves trapped in their hometown in The Crazies, a reinvention of the George Romero classic directed by Breck Eisner from a screenplay by Ray Wright (Pulse, Case 39) and Scott Kosar (The Amityville Horror, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre).
David Dutten (Timothy Olyphant) is sheriff of Ogden Marsh, a picture-perfect American town with happy, law-abiding citizens. But one night, one of them comes to a school baseball game with a loaded shotgun, ready to kill. Another man burns down his own house…after locking his wife and young son in a closet inside. Within days, the town has transformed into a sickening asylum; people who days ago lived quiet, unremarkable lives have now become depraved, blood-thirsty killers, hiding in the darkness with guns and knives. Sheriff Dutten tries to make sense of what’s happening as the horrific, nonsensical violence escalates. Something is infecting the citizens of Ogden Marsh…with insanity.
Now complete anarchy reigns as one by one the townsfolk succumb to an unknown toxin and turn sadistically violent. In an effort to keep the madness contained, the government uses deadly force to close off all access and won’t let anyone in or out – even those uninfected. The few still sane find themselves trapped: Sheriff Dutten; his pregnant wife, Judy (Radha Mitchell); Becca (Danielle Panabaker), an assistant at the medical center; and Russell (Joe Anderson), Dutten’s deputy and right-hand man. Forced to band together, an ordinary night becomes a horrifying struggle for survival as they do their best to get out of town alive.
"The Crazies" Clip 1: "There's Someone Outside"
"The Crazies" Clip 2: "What Does It Mean"
"The Crazies" Clip 3: "Carwash"
The Crazies: Immersion Featurette
New Character Posters and Trailer for "The Crazies"
1:51 PM | News, Remake, The Crazies, Trailer with 0 comments »


We here recently received new character posters and the third official trailer for the upcoming remake of "The Crazies".
Imagine living in a small town where everything is safe and happy…until suddenly it isn’t. Imagine your friends and neighbors going quickly and horrifically insane. In a terrifying tale of the “American Dream” gone horribly wrong, four friends find themselves trapped in their hometown in The Crazies, a reinvention of the George Romero classic directed by Breck Eisner from a screenplay by Ray Wright (Pulse, Case 39) and Scott Kosar (The Amityville Horror, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre).
David Dutten (Timothy Olyphant) is sheriff of Ogden Marsh, a picture-perfect American town with happy, law-abiding citizens. But one night, one of them comes to a school baseball game with a loaded shotgun, ready to kill. Another man burns down his own house…after locking his wife and young son in a closet inside. Within days, the town has transformed into a sickening asylum; people who days ago lived quiet, unremarkable lives have now become depraved, blood-thirsty killers, hiding in the darkness with guns and knives. Sheriff Dutten tries to make sense of what’s happening as the horrific, nonsensical violence escalates. Something is infecting the citizens of Ogden Marsh…with insanity.
Now complete anarchy reigns as one by one the townsfolk succumb to an unknown toxin and turn sadistically violent. In an effort to keep the madness contained, the government uses deadly force to close off all access and won’t let anyone in or out – even those uninfected. The few still sane find themselves trapped: Sheriff Dutten; his pregnant wife, Judy (Radha Mitchell); Becca (Danielle Panabaker), an assistant at the medical center; and Russell (Joe Anderson), Dutten’s deputy and right-hand man. Forced to band together, an ordinary night becomes a horrifying struggle for survival as they do their best to get out of town alive.
The film hits theaters on February 26th.
"The Crazies": Official Trailer #3
Official Poster for "The Crazies" remake
12:16 PM | George A. Romero, News, Remake, The Crazies with 0 comments »Imagine living in a small town where everything is safe and happy…until suddenly it isn’t. Imagine your friends and neighbors going quickly and horrifically insane. In a terrifying tale of the “American Dream” gone horribly wrong, four friends find themselves trapped in their hometown in The Crazies, a reinvention of the George Romero classic directed by Breck Eisner from a screenplay by Ray Wright (Pulse, Case 39) and Scott Kosar (The Amityville Horror, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre).
David Dutten (Timothy Olyphant) is sheriff of Ogden Marsh, a picture-perfect American town with happy, law-abiding citizens. But one night, one of them comes to a school baseball game with a loaded shotgun, ready to kill. Another man burns down his own house…after locking his wife and young son in a closet inside. Within days, the town has transformed into a sickening asylum; people who days ago lived quiet, unremarkable lives have now become depraved, blood-thirsty killers, hiding in the darkness with guns and knives. Sheriff Dutten tries to make sense of what’s happening as the horrific, nonsensical violence escalates. Something is infecting the citizens of Ogden Marsh…with insanity.
Now complete anarchy reigns as one by one the townsfolk succumb to an unknown toxin and turn sadistically violent. In an effort to keep the madness contained, the government uses deadly force to close off all access and won’t let anyone in or out – even those uninfected. The few still sane find themselves trapped: Sheriff Dutten; his pregnant wife, Judy (Radha Mitchell); Becca (Danielle Panabaker), an assistant at the medical center; and Russell (Joe Anderson), Dutten’s deputy and right-hand man. Forced to band together, an ordinary night becomes a horrifying struggle for survival as they do their best to get out of town alive.
The film hits theaters February 26th.
The Crazies: Official Trailer #2
Official Teaser Posters and Trailer for "The Crazies" remake.
9:59 AM | News, Remake, The Crazies with 0 comments »

The Crazies, a reinvention of the George Romero classic directed by Breck Eisner from a screenplay by Ray Wright (Pulse, Case 39) and Scott Kosar (The Amityville Horror, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre).
David Dutten (Timothy Olyphant) is sheriff of Ogden Marsh, a picture-perfect American town with happy, law-abiding citizens. But one night, one of them comes to a school baseball game with a loaded shotgun, ready to kill. Another man burns down his own house…after locking his wife and young son in a closet inside. Within days, the town has transformed into a sickening asylum; people who days ago lived quiet, unremarkable lives have now become depraved, blood-thirsty killers, hiding in the darkness with guns and knives. Sheriff Dutten tries to make sense of what’s happening as the horrific, nonsensical violence escalates. Something is infecting the citizens of Ogden Marsh…with insanity.
Now complete anarchy reigns as one by one the townsfolk succumb to an unknown toxin and turn sadistically violent. In an effort to keep the madness contained, the government uses deadly force to close off all access and won’t let anyone in or out – even those uninfected. The few still sane find themselves trapped: Sheriff Dutten; his pregnant wife, Judy (Radha Mitchell); Becca (Danielle Panabaker), an assistant at the medical center; and Russell (Joe Anderson), Dutten’s deputy and right-hand man. Forced to band together, an ordinary night becomes a horrifying struggle for survival as they do their best to get out of town alive.
The film hits theaters Febuary 26th.
The Last House On The Left (2009) - Review by Fred [The Wolf]
3:51 AM | Fred The Wolf, horror, Remake, Review with 0 comments »DIRECTED BY
Dennis Iliadis
STARRING
Monica Potter - Emma Collingwood
Tony Goldwyn - John Collingwood
Sara Paxton - Mari Collingwood
Garret Dillahunt - Krug
Aaron Paul - Francis
Riki Lindhome - Sadie
Spencer Treat Clark - Justin
Martha MacIssac - Paige
Genre - Horror/Revenge
Running Time - 114 Minutes
Score - 3 Howls Outta 4
I can pretty much say at this point that while I can accept and tolerate them, I still dislike the recent remake trend that's going on in Hollywood. I mean, I get it. Filmmakers and the studios they work for want to update classic horror films for a newer generation who may not appreciate the older stuff because they're "ancient" or because they can't relate with the eras that they're from. Of course, there's the busine$$ aspect of the whole thing that you can't ignore. But when I see films I love like FRIDAY THE 13TH, HALLOWEEN [really HALLOWEEN II], DAY OF THE DEAD, THE HITCHER, and countless others being turned into crap because of modern Hollywood, I begin to get annoyed by the trend.
However, there are some horror films that don't really bother me when they're remade. Honestly, I think some of these movies could use a reimagining and a new vision for a modern era because they're either really dated or because they have flaws that could be improved on with a remake. THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT, 1972's directorial debut by Wes Craven, is one of these films for me. I like THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT and its effectiveness with its brutality and a classic performance by David Hess, which can't be matched. But those deputy characters and the revenge by the parents in the film are more comical today than they should be, leading me to believe that the film hasn't dated all that well. Times change and how we perceive things evolve because of it. The original still holds a place as classic horror and exploitation, but the idea of the remake earlier this year didn't disturb me because I knew at the right hands, it could be made into a more serious film. And after watching it last week, I have to say that THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT surprised me and I believe it's one of the better remakes that Hollywood has released in the past few years.
PLOT
The remake's story is pretty much similar to the original's. The Collingwood family - father and doctor John (Tony Goldwyn), mom Emma (Monica Potter), and teenage daughter Mari (Sara Paxton) - head into the country for a family trip that ends up being bittersweet since teenage son Ben has passed away and it's the Collingwoods' first trip without him. Unfortunately, the Collingwoods have no idea that a group of killers is on the loose. Leader Krug (Garret Dillahunt) has escaped from police custody with the help of his sadistic and perverted brother Francis (Aaron Paul) and Krug's girlfriend Sadie (Riki Lindhome). Through Krug's teenage son Justin (Spencer Treat Clark), the group meets up with Mari and her friend Paige (Martha MacIssac), who hang with Justin for some sweet pot although Mari is hesitant about the whole deal. Just as the girls get ready to leave, Krug and the others take them as hostages. When they don't cooperate like good hostages, the group murders Paige, rape Mari, and then leave Mari to die in a lake during a thunderstorm.
Needing a place to stay for the night, Krug's group make it to the Collingwoods country home, not knowing who each other are. When the truth is revealed, the Collingwood parents take justice in their own hands, making sure Krug and his family never forget about the last house on the left.
REVIEW
This remake really surprised the hell out of me. The previews made this film look so generic. Plus the reputation of horror remakes these days tend to lean more on the negative side, so I really wasn't expecting a remake to an exploitation film like THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT to really meet my low expectations. But not only was this remake better than the previews had led me to believe, but it's also one of the better horror remakes that Hollywood has made since the trend started.
The story/narrative is pretty much the same as the original. However the way the same story is told in each version is very different. In the 1972 version, the story was a product of social commentary at the time relating to feminism, Vietnam, and the disillusion of the government. It truly reflected each of these issues, creating a story that was not only gritty, but effectively brutal. In the 2009 version, these issues don't exist anymore. Instead, the screenwriters went for a simple revenge flick formula where the parents get revenge on those who have raped and almost murdered their daughter. Yes, we've seen films like this quite frequently. But when they're written well and do enough to make you feel for the protagonists to the point where you want them to get revenge on these evil people, then why would anyone want to complain? Unlike the original, you never really question if the parents were justified in what they do to Krug and his gang. You know it's an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. It works and you're captivated from beginning to end.
I do think the characterization of the villains could have been stronger. While Krug, Sadie, and Francis are horrible, dispicable people, they don't seem as sadistic as they should be. In the original, the villains were really the scum of the earth and you really got a sense that these people were horrible and had no sense of morality at all. In this remake, they seem very generic. Krug's character could be interchangable with many other similar villains in any revenge film. Plus Sadie, who was a really dispicable bitch in the original, seems to be more sorry and almost questions her actions judging by her body language and facial expressions. Only Francis seems to really be similar to his original counterpart, Weasel, not hiding the fact that he's a pervert and doesn't mind getting his hands dirty to get what he wants. While I like the protagonist characters in the remake more, the villains in the original are still tops for me.
I also thought some sub-plots weren't really necessary. Obviously the main one was the teasing of the Collingwood's disinegrating marriage. You can tell there was more to it than what the narrative or the film allows, but nothing really comes from it. So really, it could have been left out. Also Sadie's lesbian tendencies are displayed quite frequently and she seems like a sexual deviant. But that part of her personality quickly disappears. And then there's the final scene involving a microwave. Yeah. The less said about that, the better.
The gore and brutality in the remake isn't as much as the original. We do get some stabbings and bullets hitting flesh. Plus there's that surgery scene and a head blowing up. Let's not forget the hand in the garbage disposal. And the rape sequence went further than I thought it would, especially in more PC times. Nothing to really write home about but it does it job.
The direction by Dennis Iliadis is really good. I thought the composition shots and cinematography was absolutely beautiful. Iliadis really made the silence in the film more deafening than the louder moments, making the more brutal moments in the film more so. And there was definitely a nice use of creating momentum and tension. The visuals were very pleasant and I have no complaints at all about the directorial work.
The acting was quite good too. Monica Potter played the part of overprotective and vulnerable wife and mother really well. I sympathetized with the character and found her reactions to what was going on really believable. Nice job. Tony Goldwyn held his own too as the husband and father. But I don't think the role was beefy enough to really mean much. His action scenes with the killers were cool but there wasn't really all that much to the character. Sara Paxton played the "nice girl" role perfectly. Aaron Paul was great as the perverted Francis. He totally convinced me in the way he used his body and his face. Riki Lindhome did okay as Sadie, but her character should have been given more to do. Spencer Treat Clark played the kid who was caught up in a messed up situation really well. And Garret Dillahunt is no David Hess, but he was alright as Krug. It was more subtle than I was expecting and I honestly can't picture anyone but Hess in the role. But his performance was good.
THINGS I'VE LEARNED WHILE NEVER GOING UP TO MY COUNTRY HOUSE ON THE LEFT
- Never refuse a criminal his right to pee. It's better to be pissed on than to piss him off. Your life depends on it.
- Don't get too excited when two hot girls give you a makeover if you're a dude. They're not trying to get with you. You've just become their new gay friend. Congrats.
- "Memories are important." I agree. Like the time me and my frat buddy had too much to drink and we both woke up with our asses in unexplainable pain.
...Correction - Memories are overrated. Screw 'em!
- It's good to have a doctor for a dad. He'll stitch your broken nose. He'll stop the bleeding and put a tube inside so you can breathe. And he's a pro with the anal thermometer. No wonder every woman wants to marry a doctor.
- Don't go after a married woman. You'll receive a sharp pain in your chest after she rejects you. Or after she stabs you with a large butcher knife. Whichever comes first.
- Emma shot Sadie right in the eye, killing her. Damn, she wouldn't last long in the porn industry, would she?
THE FINAL HOWL
THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT is a surprisingly good remake that kept me entertained from beginning to end. It's not as brutal or as memorable as the original, but it takes the story a bit more seriously and I thought the revenge motif came off better here than it did in the original. So I think they both balance each other out and are both worth watching for different reasons. All in all, THE LAST HOUSE ON THE LEFT '09 is a highlight of a lackluster year and will probably be on my Best Of '09 list by the end of December.
"Sorority Row" Review - Written by Anthony T
10:29 PM | Remake, Reviews, Sorority Row with 2 comments »
Sorority Row
Year: 2009
Director: Stewart Hendler
Studio: Summit Entertainment
Stars: Briana Evigan, Leah Pipes, Carrie Fisher
MPAA Rating: R
Running Time: 101 Mins
Another week, another remake as this week is “Sorority Row”. This film is based on the 1983 film, “The House on Sorority Row”. This film is one of those films, where it could have easily turned into a very bad experience.
The film is about six girls who are having the time of their live, as they throw a party at their sorority house known as “Theta Pi”. They decide to play a prank on one of the sorority girl’s brothers, by having Megan fake her own death. After that happened, they all drive to an isolated road, where they plan to dump the body. But the prank turns deadly, when the brother thinking that Megan is really dead, actually kills her with a tire-iron. Soon, the sisters decide to dump her body in an abandoned well and move on with their lives.
Eight months later, the remaining five sisters are having one last week of fun together, before moving on after graduating. Everything is fine, until they receive a mysterious picture on their cell phones containing a picture of Megan’s dead body. Soon the killer starts stalking and killing the girls. Has Megan come back from the dead or is the killer someone that wants the girls dead for some other reason.
“Sorority Row” is one of those films that surprised me. The reason for this, the film started off bad, because the first ten minutes looked like this film was headed towards boring B-movie territory with everything feeling rushed. That would have also made me miserable, since I had to sit through the “Twilight: New Moon” trailer, right before the film. But thankfully that was not the case as this enjoyed this film after that.
Director, Stewart Hendler saves this film by going for a “Scream” and “I Know What You Did Last Summer” style. By directing the film in that style, it makes the film very enjoyable and most of the performances feel down to earth. The style also slows everything down, as I weren’t annoyed with any of the characters and it also lets the story develop. Hendler makes this film fun, because the scares were timed well. There was also couple of scenes that made me jump out of my seat. That’s part of the reason why I enjoyed it. Hendler also did a good job handling the death sequences. They were very creative, as it did two things: creates scares and makes the film fun to watch. He also does a good job making acting good, even though the acting kind of sucked in the first ten minutes. Once we did to the main part of the film, Handler does a good job making the performance toned down for the rest of the film compared to the first ten minutes where most of the girls were just annoying. It also made each of the main character interesting or hated.
The film also had a good screenplay. I liked how Josh Stolberg and Pete Goldfinger go for more of a ninety feel to the story instead of trying to be campy and go for a copied eighty style. If it went that route, then this would have been a boring film to watch. What the screenwriters did right was to stop rushing everything, after the opening act. The opening act felt like it was going to be a film where everything was going to be rushed. But to their credit they didn’t do that, instead they did a good job exploring each of the characters, in the aftermath of Megan’s death. That helped covered up the mess of the first ten minutes. Stolberg and Goldfinger does a good job going into each of the girls, as they became interesting all of sudden which surprised me, as it became a totally different film, after the opening scene. It became more suspenseful film, instead of a campy 80’s horror film. I liked how they made the action suspenseful and the way they kept the identity of killer very secretive, as it not who you think it is. That’s what I think makes this a very good horror film.
I know that most of you readers unlike me, who are seeing this film to get a sneak peek at the “Twilight: New Moon” trailer. You should not dismiss this film and run away afterwards. “Sorority Row” is a film that I had some expectation going in,thankfull it didn’t turn to be a completely bad. Instead, it’s suspenseful horror film that will keep you guessing and on edge.
Review Rating: Four Stars
"The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3" review by Ben Kenber
12:52 AM | denzel washington, john travolta, Remake, Reviews with 0 comments »
Now, from the mechanics of hell, we bring you this week’s edition of the Hollywood Remake Machine. Yes they’re back, plundering the films of the past to suck you in with whatever dollars are left from your wallet (and that’s even if you’re unemployed). This week’s victim is “The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3.” Based on the book by John Godey, it was first made into a movie back in 1974 with Walter Matthau as policeman Garber, and Robert Shaw as Bernard Ryder. Some may have forgotten, but there was another remake of this as a TV movie back in 1998 with Edward James Olmos, Lorraine Bracco, and Vincent D’Onofrio. But it looks like one single remake was just not enough, so Hollywood remade it AGAIN, and this one is further proof that… Oh wait a minute… This one is actually good! What happened? Could it be? YES!!! …Ahem… Excuse me for going overboard there. We aren’t exactly talking about a classic, but of one that delivers the goods.
This version of “Pelham 1 2 3” comes to us from director Tony Scott, the man who gave us “Top Gun” and “Beverly Hills Cop II” among other movies, and who is also the younger brother of Ridley Scott. Along with Tony in this one is an actor he has worked with several times before, Denzel Washington. In addition, you have John Travolta as the chief hijacker of the bunch. They take on the roles that were first immortalized on the big screen by Walter Matthau and Robert Shaw. The basic premise of the movie remains the same: a group of hijackers (but of course, they are called terrorists these days) takes over a subway train, stops it in a tunnel, unhooks the other cars on the train, thus leaving them with one train car to worry about, and then they make their intentions clear. They want $10 million dollars in exactly 60 minutes, and not a minute over. For every minute they are late, they will shoot a hostage. This particular story will always be referred to as “Die Hard on a subway.” With all the amazing advances in technology, you’d figure that this premise would not work in today’s world with utter dependence on electronics to keep us informed and in touch. This is especially the case considering the paranoid feeling that the FBI and CIA are watching us all the time.
But Tony Scott gives us a film that, unlike the 1998 TV movie, is not simply a shot for shot remake. Tony takes the premise and updates it for today’s world, and gives us an action thriller that is more psychological than anything else. Just when you think you know where the story is heading, it takes a sharp turn and leaves you wondering what will happen next. I imagine there might be some gaps in logic to be found here, but I certainly wasn’t thinking about them while watching the movie. I was too busy getting caught up in the suspense and excitement of it all. For once, the excuse of cell phones not working actually makes sense and doesn’t simply insult our collective intelligence. Plus, all the characters (including the bad guys) make effective use of the technology available to them to where each side is manipulating the other.
Brian Helgeland, the screenwriter of “LA Confidential” and “Mystic River,” scripted this version (David Koepp did some work on it too, but he was not given credit). While the 1974 version functioned more as a cat and mouse game between the cops and the hijackers, this one is more focused on the relationship between Garber and (as Travolta’s character asks Garber to call him) Ryder. This brings me to one of the things I really liked about this version; we get characters who are morally compromised, and who have more in common with each other than they realized, and the line between them is not simply black or white. How they see each other really humanizes the story and keeps it from becoming just another average action flick.
Denzel Washington’s character of Garber is essentially a good guy, but he has been accused of bribery and is up on charges that leave is a heavy cloud of uncertainty hanging over his every move. For a ridiculously brief moment, I thought Denzel would be wrong for this role. Throughout his great career, we have seen him play many powerful leaders and of men in charge (or so they think) of everything and everybody around him. To see him play a regular blue collar kind of guy, being the big superstar that he is, made me worry that I wouldn’t buy him as a Garber the train dispatcher. What the hell was I thinking?! Denzel more than sells himself in the part as a regular joe, and you feel every ounce of his frustration as he struggles to maintain a situation he was not supposed to be put into. Whatever you think of his character, he makes you root for him despite the things he may have done wrong. Denzel once again reminds us (especially those who foolishly forgot) that he is one of the very best film actors, period.
John Travolta has had an iffy record in playing the bad guy, and this is mainly because we spent so much time watching him be the hero when we were younger. Sure, he did the bad guy really well in John Woo’s “Face/Off,” but then he played one of the most pussy-whipped bitches of a mob boss ever in “The Punisher.” By the way, that was one of the worst adaptations of a Marvel Comic ever! But as “Ryder,” Travolta gives us a furiously good performance and creates a very effectively dangerous character he doesn’t always sell you on. This is the same guy who a year or two ago, gave us the delightful Edna from “Hairspray.” Whereas Robert Shaw’s mercenary character was in control of his emotions, Travolta’s character is a powder keg of resentment and vengeance. Ryder is not a mercenary, but a former broker on Wall Street who just finished a stretch in prison, and now he has a score to settle with the city that sent him to the big house for 10 years instead of letting him plea bargain for 3. I almost wanted to laugh when I saw him with those tattoos on his neck, but Travolta really does come off as a bad ass mofo you do not want to mess with.
The mayor of New York is also back in the story, having been absent from the 1998 TV remake, and he is still despised as ever. This time, he is played by Tony Soprano himself, James Gandolfini. Once again proving to be another great actor working today, he manages to give us an elected official that is selfish and yet resourceful. James also keeps the character from becoming a simple caricature which is what we usually get with a character like this. Along with Washington, he gets some of the movie’s best lines thanks to Helgeland. Of course, does this mean that he will always be typecast as a crook since he is playing a politician? That’s just a thought.
I also have to say that I was really pleased to see Luis Guzmán cast as Phil Ramos, a disgraced motorman who is going along with Ryder’s revenge on the Big Apple. It feels like it has been far too long since I last saw Luis in a movie, and ever since I first saw him in “Carlito’s Way,” he has been and continues to be one of the most reliable of character actors. Always giving a memorable performance in every single movie he does, Luis gives a man who is a little more in touch with reality than Ryder is.
What I really liked about this version of “Pelham 1 2 3” is that it manages to not just repeat every single scene you saw in the original. Both Tony Scott and Brian Helgeland have effectively managed to update the story to a post 9/11 world where the threat of terrorism always feels like it’s around the corner, waiting like a snake to strike. Also, by giving a lot of focus to the two main characters and making them far from perfect adds a little more reality and genuine feeling to the more intense moments of the movie. I am so sick of the flawless hero in the movies who doesn’t have a single thing wrong with him or her. We need these characters to have flaws that we can recognize in ourselves so that we can relate to them and share in their danger, a danger they didn’t ask to be a part of. Thanks to the filmmakers and actors, they pulled it off very well.
The movie does share similar moments with the 1974 version, but it deviates from it in ways I couldn’t have seen coming. The ending is also a lot different from the original, which by the way was one of my all time favorites. All the same, I’m glad Tony Scott and company didn’t try to top the cleverness of that one. It would have been cool, but that is a hard ending to match. While this one ends in a more routine way, it is still exciting.
There’s also no topping the original’s film score which was composed by David Shire. The music was one of my favorite things about the film, and the soundtrack is one of my all time favorites. Still, frequent Tony Scott collaborator Harry Gregson-Williams gives us a combination of orchestral and electronic music that gives the film the propulsive feel it really needs. Looking back, I don’t think I have given Harry enough credit for the work he has done.
Tony Scott has more or less been in the shadow of his big brother Ridley, and while his career has been successful, his movies never seem to get the same amount of respect as do Ridley’s. His use of flash frames and slow motion can be off-putting at times, but this is the same guy who gave us “Crimson Tide” and “True Romance.” With “The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3,” he gives one of the more exciting action movies that lifted me out of the doldrums of a so far weak summer movie season. Tony doesn’t bring a lot that is new to this kind of story, but he keeps things exciting throughout, and I felt myself on the edge of my seat in a way I didn’t expect to. In a lot of ways, this movie was a pleasant surprise, being that it is another gosh darn remake.
If I were compare, I obviously think the 1974 original is still the best adaptation of John Godey’s exciting novel. I won’t bother too much with the 1998 TV movie since that felt a lot like a shot for shot remake a la “Psycho” or “Funny Games.” But Scott’s film of “The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3” is far more entertaining than any remake has a right to be these days. Scott has managed to take this material and make his own, and he is surrounded by a great cast. This makes me want to watch “Domino” at some point because I missed that one while it was in theaters.
Looking for a good action picture? I don’t think you can go wrong with this one.
***1/2 out of ****
"John Carpenter's The Thing" review by Ben Kenber
3:49 PM | horror, john carpenter, kurt russell, Remake, the thing with 0 comments »
Many of you probably know the story behind “John Carpenter’s The Thing;” It came out in the summer of 1982, two weeks after Steven Spielberg’s “E.T,” and while the alien from that movie was warm and cuddly, the one in Carpenter’s movie was cold, ugly, and utterly vicious. As a result, the movie was unceremoniously smashed by both critics and fans alike, and they never tried to hide their disgust towards Carpenter for what they saw as pornography of movie violence. In all fairness though, the movie was released at the wrong time of the year. To release this movie during what Carpenter had called the “summer of love” opposite not just “E.T.,” but also “Star Trek II” and “Tron” among other movies was a big mistake on the part of Universal Pictures, and they would have had more luck with it had it been released during the winter instead.
Years later however, “The Thing,” like many of John Carpenter’s movies (“Big Trouble In Little China” is another perfect example) ended up finding the audience it deserved through home video and later DVD. Perhaps it was ahead of its time, but it is now considered (and rightly so) one of the best horror and sci-fi movies ever made, and it is easily the best horror remake in a sea of horrendously crappy ones. I think plays better today than it did when first released, and it is still utterly terrifying 25 years or so after its initial release.
Unlike the original Howard Hawks version of “The Thing,” Carpenter’s movie hews much closer to the short story it was based on called “Who Goes There?” by John W. Campbell, Jr. The movie takes place at an American scientific research outpost in
The premise of this movie is genius because it allows for an unending escalation of tension and suspense throughout. Like the characters, you have no idea who to trust and of who is the thing. The paranoia that closes in on these characters puts them in an airtight cage that gets smaller and smaller as it heads to its inevitable climax. There are no women to be found in this movie which eliminates any sexual tension that might have added an unnecessary element to the movie. Many say that this makes the movie sexist, but that’s a ridiculous charge. There’s no hatred of women to be found here, unless you count how Kurt Russell’s character treats the Chess Wizard computer with a female voice.
This movie also came out when the whole world was starting to become aware of the AIDS virus. The idea of any sort of virus infecting us completely and rearranging our body to the point may have seemed unreal to us back then. But today, it is a reality that is more horrifying than ever, and it still presents itself with no real cure. This makes “The Thing” all the more scarier to take in when watching it now. The scene where Dr. Blair (Wilford Brimley) observes a computer image of the virus infecting a human host is one of the movie’s scariest moments, and seems all too real a possibility when watching it today. The only thing truly dated about that scene is that the computer graphics look like they are from an old Atari game, but it doesn’t change the frightening concept that it is. Other movies like “Outbreak” have used imaging like this, and it is still an incredibly effective way of conveying the danger of an uncontrollable disease.
“The Thing” also marks one of several collaborations between director John Carpenter and actor Kurt Russell who started working together on the TV movie “Elvis.” After all these years of being a movie star, Kurt can still make you believe that he is a down to earth guy like the rest of us, and his role as helicopter pilot R.J. MacReady is one of his most underrated. You never get the feeling that Kurt is acting in this film. Instead, Kurt inhabits the character he plays, and you follow him every step of the way without any doubt of who the hero (or in this case, the antihero) is.
Carpenter cast the movie perfectly with such actors as future SAG President Richard Masur, Richard Dysart, Donald Moffat, and David Clennon among others. But one of the best performances to come out of “The Thing” was from Wilford Brimley as Dr. Blair. In the past, we have been exposed to Mr. Brimley through countless oatmeal commercials and roles as the grandfather we had or wished we had in our lives. But his role in “The Thing” offered him one of the few opportunities he had to go completely against type. As Dr. Blair, Wilford goes from curious to utterly horrified by what this unknown creature can do, and he ends up wreaking havoc in a way that you would never see in any oatmeal commercial (except maybe for the ones with not enough fiber). In a movie where no one can trust anyone around them, Dr. Blair becomes the one that people want to trust but don’t dare to all the same.
One of the other truly great actors in this movie is Keith David (not to be confused with actor David Keith) who plays Childs. Keith has a “don’t mess with me” intensity, and he matches Kurt Russell’s intensity every step of the way. The tension between the two is almost as frightening as is waiting for that alien to make its next horrifically gory entrance. Keith was later cast in John Carpenter’s “They Live,” and he remains one of the most underrated actors working today.
But c’mon! Let’s talk about who the real star of “John Carpenter’s The Thing” really is, other than the director himself. That would be Mr. Rob Bottin who designed the movie’s horrifically brilliant special effects and makeup designs. Long before the advance of computer technology and CGI, Rob had to make all these designs from scratch, and what he came up with is now considered a benchmark in the field of special makeup effects. This is not your typical slasher movie where the murders are bloody but not altogether creative. The thing mimics everything it touches, and this must have been a pure inspiration for Bottin to let his imagination run amuck with what he could come up with. You never know what’s coming next in this film, and that makes it even scarier than it already is.
Some have called the movie a “geek show” that was only made with the intention of grossing people out. Granted, a good case could be made for that, but “The Thing” is a lot more than that. It explores a theme that is commonplace in many of John Carpenter’s movies; the struggle to maintain one’s individuality. Of never letting go of who you see yourself as, because that allows you to survive in a world that keeps finding new ways of robbing it from you when you least know it. The threat of that loss is ever so real in this movie, and the characters have the unfortunate disadvantage of being stuck in one of the most remote and desolate places on the face of the earth.
I also imagine that a big complaint people have about “The Thing” is that we never learn much about the alien or where it came from. Basically, we know it’s from outer space (the spaceship crashing on earth during the opening credits pretty much spells that out), that imitates whatever it comes in contact with, and that it deals with the cold better than any of these men do. Here’s the thing, do we really need to know everything about this creature? Maybe not knowing is more terrifying than knowing. It leaves a lot of things to the viewer’s imagination, and I love that because it leaves open so many possibilities for how this horrific situation is going to play out. Your worst fears come out of your unconsciousness, and you find yourself experiencing the movie more than watching it.
The ending of “The Thing” is quite ambiguous as we never come to know which of the remaining characters is human and who is not. In an age where people need to have everything explained or spelled out for them (especially if it involves math), this drives people nuts. I dig these kind of endings sometimes though, as it leaves a lot to the imagination. It also leaves you with an unsettling feeling that stays with you long after the movie is over, making it a very unforgettable experience. Maybe we are lacking completely in the imagination if we have to know what happens at the end of the movie. It’s one of the fill in the blanks endings, and we can only assume what happens. Not knowing can be more truly terrifying than knowing.
I still think that this movie is really John Carpenter’s masterpiece, even over the classic “Halloween.” With this movie, he proves to be one of the true masters of horror and suspense as he endlessly generates unbearable tension throughout the movie’s running time. Just when you think the movie has peaked, you quickly realize that it has not. Carpenter’s goal here is not just to make us jump out of our seats (he does get some serious ones in though), but to make us feel the terrifying isolation and complete lack of trust that these scientists cannot escape from. What the hell would we have done in that situation?
Carpenter has said that this movie was the first in his apocalypse trilogy (the other two were “Prince of Darkness” and “In The Mouth of Madness”), and the movie does have an unrelentingly bleak tone which made it seem completely out of place back in 1982. As time goes on though, many of us keep thinking the world is coming to an end (the economic crisis we are currently in seems to enhance this feeling all the more strongly). Plus, with more deadly diseases like the Ebola Virus among others, the scenario of “The Thing” feels all the more frighteningly real.
The popularity of “The Thing” still does not seem to have reached its peak just yet. Its influence on popular culture is felt more and more to the point where as we speak, Ronald D. Moore (executive producer of the new “Battlestar Galactica”) is working on a prequel. “
Some movies are robbed of their greatness through the passage of time, and some now seem horrendously stupid in how stylistically dated they are. We watch some things from the past, and we wonder why we liked them so much in the first place. What the hell were we thinking anyway?! But “The Thing” is an exception to this case as time has made it seem all the more effective. You can’t help but think that this movie may have been ahead of its time when it was originally released in 1982. It remains one of those movies that I never ever tire of watching and it more than it deserves its place as one of the greatest movies to come out of the 1980’s.







